Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah

Assist jewish religious institutions through giving grants

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$422kInternational$30kHealth$19k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $97,501, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,382,576 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,285,075 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$11,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAIS MEDRASH KEREM SHLOMO$50,000
BEHAVIOR ANALYST OF CENTRAL JERSEY$19,000
CONGREGATION KEDISHES YOM TOV$11,600
MITZADEI GAVER$9,901
CONGREGATION MACHZEH AVROHOM$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NETZACH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%CONGREGATION KEDISHES YOM TOV: $12k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF VENATENU INC: $30k → 15%BAIS MEDRASH KEREM SHLOMO: $50k → 11%YAD LEAZOR TORAH: $25k → 17%CONGREGATION OUR LAYESHORIM: $40k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL IAACOV: $25k → 15%KEREN TORAH VECHESED INC: $30k → 11%YESHIVAT DARCHEI ERES: $28k → 20%BEHAVIOR ANALYST OF CENTRAL JERSEY: $19k → 11%YESHIVAT DARCHEI ERES: $25k → 20%SEPHARDIC CONG OF LAKEWOOD: $6k → 11%YESHIVAT DARCHEI ERES: $25k → 20%YESHIVA MAGEN DAVID: $23k → 20%YESHIVA MAGEN DAVID: $22k → 20%YESHIVAT DARCHEI ERES: $14k → 20%NEVE SHALEV BETENU: $10k → 20%NEVE SHALEV BETENU: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION KEREN HAGEMACH: $20k → 20%CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $8k → 20%YESHIVAT ATERET YISRAEL: $5k → 20%CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $6k → 20%MITZADEI GAVER: $10k → 20%ORCHOT DAVID INC: $7k → 20%ORCHOT DAVID INC: $6k → 20%MITZADEI GAVER: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION MACHZEH AVROHOM: $7k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $3.3M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$3.3M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 6 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$198k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
0%

Still filing today

17%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $93k · revenue +69%
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k
  • MG
    MITZADEI GAVER INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue -47%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONGREGATION OUR LAYESHORIM
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • KT
    KEREN TORAH VCHESED
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -16%
  • AF
    American Friends of Venatenu Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Ziv Israel Association
—
3
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Zechut Avot Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
6
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
7
The Tov Vchesed Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
11
Tov V Chesed Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Ohel Yakov Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orchot David Inc; the most unlike its peers is Netzach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH KEREM SHLOMO INC: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH KEREM SHLOMO INCMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $44,991 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHCONGREGATION OUR LAYESHORIM: $40,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OUR LAYESHORIMCONGREGATION KEREN HAGEMACH: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN HAGEMACHBEHAVIOR ANALYST OF CENTRAL JERSEY: $19,000 · OtherBEHAVIOR ANALYST OF CENTRAL JERSEYNEVE SHALEV BETENU: $16,530 · OtherNEVE SHALEV BETENUGEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $13,000 · OtherGEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOKCENTRAL CONGREGATIONS OF YETEV LEV DSATMAR: $11,600 · Other+4 more: $23,300 · Other+4 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $92,677 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INCAmerican Friends of Ohel Iaacov Inc: $25,000 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Ohel Iaacov…ORCHOT DAVID INC: $13,220 · ReligionORCHOT DAVID INCYAD LEAZOR TORAH VOCHESED FUND: $25,000 · PhilanthropyYAD LEAZOR…MITZADEI GAVER INC: $17,101 · PhilanthropyMITZADEI G…KEREN TORAH VCHESED: $30,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Venatenu Inc: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$238,421Religion$130,897Philanthropy$42,101International$30,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $92,677 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Venatenu Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetYAD LEAZOR TORAH VOCHESED FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ohel Iaacov Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetMITZADEI GAVER INC: $17,101 over 2y, 13% of budgetNETZACH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN TORAH VCHESED ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Venatenu Inc ↗
  • Who funds YAD LEAZOR TORAH VOCHESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ohel Iaacov Inc ↗
  • Who funds MITZADEI GAVER INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCHOT DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds NETZACH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY35× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Keren Yom Tov Inc · Aar Charitable Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah?

    Find your warmest path to American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Friends of Ya'Adir Torah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph