Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Keren Yom Tov Inc

Awards grants to jewish educational & charitable institutions and publish translations of the bible, and it's commentaries

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$581k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$5.2MEducation$318kPhilanthropy$52kInternational$45kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$18kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 28 grants below total $1,388,327 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,538,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,150,131 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $373k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $364k
  • $250k+1 grant · $581k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA DARCHEI ERETZ SCHOOL$580,704
KHT YESODOT HATORAH$156,667
HKY KOL YAAOB$125,400
AHAVAT SHALOM$82,218
KINYAN HAMESECHTA INC$48,995
CHESED LAVRAHAM$47,200
BNEI DAVID OF LONG BRANCH$46,084
YESHIVAT ATERET TORAH$40,075
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAADIR TORAH$39,000
OR CHADASH INSTITUTIONS$22,000
CONGREGATION SEFARADI YESOD HADAT$20,000
KETER ARAM TZOVA$20,000
YAD YOSEF TORAH CENTER$17,700
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$15,000
CONG SHAARE ZION$14,334
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AHAVAT TZEDAKOS: $5k → 11%GMACH OF JACKSON: $6k → 11%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $7k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $1.7M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Israel$1.7M · 100% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · GENRAL SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 18 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$5.3M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+4%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +69%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH
    3× · 2020–2024 · $764k · revenue +317%
  • KH
    KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $311k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIRGUN YRA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +24%
  • SC
    SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION OF LONG BRANCH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
5
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
6
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
7
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
8
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
9
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
10
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
11
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
12
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Imrei Daat Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marvin Azrak and Sons Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%12%<5yr15%11%5–10yr21%28%10–20yr21%26%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr9%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%56%<5yr15%6%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr21%12%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr9%5%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 56% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/61
the rest of the field
11%
4,727/43,871

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
21/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC — $2,581,122 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC+5 more — $144,600 · ReligionCONGREGATION AHAVAT SHALOM - BROOKLYN NY — $434,012 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAT SHALO…CHESED LAVRAHAM — $179,802 · OtherCHESED LAVRAHAMBET MIDRASH NY — $148,375 · OtherBET MIDRASH NYSHAARE ZION CONGREGATION — $135,110 · OtherSHAARE ZION CONGREGATIONATERET TORAH CENTER — $121,815 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTEROR HACHAYIM INC — $43,000 · Other+16 more — $216,861 · Other+16 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH — $764,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…+2 more — $34,600 · InternationalKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST — $311,067 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYE…FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC — $89,218 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF…KINYAN HAMESHECHTA INC — $48,995 · PhilanthropyKINYAN HAM…Bnei David of Long Branch Inc — $46,084 · PhilanthropyBnei David…+2 more — $14,400 · PhilanthropyHKY KOL YAAKAB INC — $223,000 · EducationYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC — $41,000 · EducationSHA'AREI ZION INSTITUTIONS INC — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $15,200 · EducationCONGREGACION SEFARADI YSOD HADT INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentWE LOVE TO HELP — $6,500 · Human ServicesGEMACH OF JACKSON INC — $6,300 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP — $5,100 · Human Services
Religion$2,725,722Other$1,278,975International$798,600Philanthropy$509,764Education$289,200Youth Development$30,000Human Services$17,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC — $2,581,122 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH — $764,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST — $311,067 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC — $223,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC — $89,218 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKETER ARAM TZOVA INC — $69,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetKINYAN HAMESHECHTA INC — $48,995 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBnei David of Long Branch Inc — $46,084 over 1y, 53% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC — $43,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC — $41,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARVIN AZRAK AND SONS FOUNDATION INC — $29,200 over 3y, 39% of budgetOR HADDASH INSTITUTIONS INC — $22,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIRGUN YRA — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCONGREGACION SEFARADI YSOD HADT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV — $18,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC — $14,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHA'AREI ZION INSTITUTIONS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc — $9,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISSE RAHAMIM INC — $8,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC — $6,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC — $6,200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlatbush Shomrim Safety Patrol Inc — $5,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP — $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT NAHALAT YTZHAQ — $5,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY68.6× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keren Yom Tov Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Keren Yom Tov Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Keren Yom Tov Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph