Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva

To support jewish orthodox education and charitable causes, provide burial assistance, provide general and holiday assistance for the needy, in the united states, israel and all other parts of the world.

$7.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$326k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$20MReligion$5.5MHuman Services$410kInternational$243k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $1,115,653, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,871,922 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,756,269 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $268k
  • $250k+2 grants · $628k
$19,970
Median grant
2
States reached
$826k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZECHER AVROHOM INC$325,906
CONG KEREN SHIVIM$302,291
GREATER BETH HATZLACHA INC$200,158
CONG EZRA VCHESED$67,609
YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH$37,995
CONG & KOLEL OHEL YESOCHOR$30,000
YESHIVA KTANA INC$27,965
BNOS PEREL$24,960
CONG DERECH EMUNA$19,970
CONG CHASDEI AVOS$17,000
CONG GER STATEN ISLAND$16,000
CONG LEV SIMCHA$15,000
CONG PNEI MENACHEM$10,000
CONG EMUNAS YISROEL$9,999
LAKEWOOD CHEDER$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 50% of grant dollars ($13M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 50% that went abroad ($13M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YESHIVA KTANA INC: $28k → 11%CONG LEV SIMCHA: $176k → 14%CONG CHASDEI AVOS: $17k → 14%CHABAD AT COLUMBIA INC: $40k → 17%CONG SHEAIRIS YISROEL: $2k → 20%GER SHTIBEL OAK AND VINE INC: $9k → 11%CONG GER STATEN ISLAND: $16k → 11%CONG LEV SIMCHA: $77k → 14%CONG DERECH EMUNA: $20k → 20%LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $7k → 11%YESHIVA KETANA INC: $5k → 11%CONG LEV SIMCHA: $52k → 14%FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI: $22k → 20%CONG LEV SIMCHA: $15k → 14%CONG AHAARI TEFILOH KINGS: $2k → 20%CONG DARKEI AVOS SANZ INC: $1k → 20%CONG YESHIVA KINYAN TORAH: $100k → 20%EMEK HATORAH: $5k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS: $7.4M → 20%MOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM: $2.8M → 20%ZECHER AVROHOM INC: $326k → 20%CONG KEREN SHIVIM: $302k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $265k → 20%GREATER BETH HATZLACHA INC: $200k → 20%PNEI MENACHIM AMERICAN FRIENDS OF: $200k → 20%MOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM INC: $200k → 20%ZECHER AVROHOM INC: $84k → 20%BINYAN YERUSHALAYIM: $134k → 20%CONG EZRA VCHESED: $68k → 20%AHAVAS TZDOKOH VCHESED INC: $61k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $38k → 20%BINYAN YERUSHALAYIM: $35k → 20%MECHON MAHARAL TZINTZ: $11k → 20%CONG & KOLEL OHEL YESOCHOR: $30k → 20%GREATER BETH HATZLOCHO INC: $10k → 20%BINYAN YERUSHALAYIM: $25k → 20%CONG PNEI MENACHEM: $10k → 20%CHIZUK HATORAH INC: $3k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $5k → 20%MIFAL MATAN BASETER: $3k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $5k → 20%CONG YESHIVA YAD MOSHE: $100k → 20%ZICHRON R MARKS FUND: $52k → 20%BNOS PEREL: $25k → 20%CONG EMUNAS YISROEL: $10k → 20%MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM: $10k → 20%NEZER GEDALYAHU: $1k → 20%BESHT: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 50% of all-years giving ($13M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$13M · 68 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 21 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +551% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
52

Total granted

$12M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+551%
-33%

Still filing today

10%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $509k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3.0M · revenue +551%
  • MH
    MOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED PNEI MENACHEM
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3.0M
  • KA
    KOLLEL AVREICHIM PNEI MENACHEM
    3× · 2020–2022 · $968k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $7.4M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.2M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $709k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $7,383,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED PNEI MENACHEM: $2,959,836 · OtherMOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED PNEI MENACHEMIndividual grant recipient: $1,248,341 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKOLLEL AVREICHIM PNEI MENACHEM: $967,536 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $865,332 · Other+75 more: $8,905,752 · Other+75 moreMOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM INC: $3,017,946 · PhilanthropyMOSDOS HATORA…ZECHER AVROHOM INC: $410,268 · Religion+2 more: $21,465 · ReligionFRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI INC: $21,760 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,000 · Education
Other$22,330,604Philanthropy$3,017,946Religion$431,733Education$28,760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM INC: $3,017,946 over 2y, 12% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $410,268 over 2y, 10% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI INC: $21,760 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetMECHON MAHARAL TZINTZ INC: $11,495 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $9,970 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOSDOS HATORAH VHACHESED OF PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds ZECHER AVROHOM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zecher Avrohom IncNY36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zecher Avrohom Inc · The Ojc Fund · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc · Park Charitable Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The United Elenar Foundation · Alternative Energy Foundation · Westlawn Foundation · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Eastlawn Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva?

    Find your warmest path to American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva’s filings →

    More from the funding graph