Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Federation for Children Growth Fund Inc

To empower families, especially lower-income families, with the freedom to choose the best k-12 education for their children.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$18MHuman Services$465kHealth$255kCommunity Improvement$215kPublic Benefit$165kEnvironment$15kOther$2.5M
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $525k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$100,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL CHOICE OHIO$750,000
EMPOWER KENTUCKY PARENTS INC$500,000
PARENTS FOR EDUCATIONAL FREEDOM NORTH CAROLINA$500,000
INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION$225,000
EDUCATION FREEDOM ALABAMA$150,000
OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIPS OF NEBRASKA$100,000
CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA$50,000
IOWA ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$40,000
PALMETTO PROMISE INSTITUTE$35,000
PENNSYLVANIA FAMILIES FOR EDUCATION CHOICE$25,000
NEBRASKA COALITION OF NONPUBLIC SCHOOLS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE: $55k → 16%LAS VEGAS URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 13%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $50k → 23%INDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $35k → 23%INDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE: $40k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $30k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 19 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$19M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

79%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $790k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +108% · 80% of their budget
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +37%
  • CE
    CHILDREN'S EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI
    2× · 2019–2022 · $560k · revenue +7% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • KK
    KEEP KIDS FIRST
    one grant, 2023 · $375k · 28% of their budget
  • II
    INVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $292k · revenue +133% · 39% of their budget
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR EDUCATIONAL FREEDOM IN NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2022 · $200k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohioans for School Choice

The organization is committed to helping people find a learning environment that allows children to grow and thrive. it is the only statewide organization that educates parents on their education options and advocates for the expansion of…

Education
2
Parents for School Options

The coalition advocates for public school options, educating policymakers about the need for expanding access to school choice options. the coalition engages media to generate news coverage about public school options.

Education
3
Education United Indy Inc

Education united fights for education justice and opportunities for indianapolis students by informing and engaging our community on public education issues.

Education
4
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
5
National Education Opportunity Network Inc

The National Education Equity Lab propels economic mobility for students from low-income communities by delivering college credit-bearing courses from our nation's top universities and colleges into low-income Title I high schools at…

Education
6
Parent Choice Inc

Parent choice, inc. exists to support school choice wisconsin, inc. and other exempt organizations that seek to expand and maintain quality educational options available to families to choose from when creating the best educational…

Education
7
Campaign for School Equity

The organization's mission is to ensure that all children, especially those of color, and families in tennessee have access to high quality education choices by uniting communities of clergy, parents, and students to raise their voices to…

Education
8
Tennesseans for Quality Early Education Policy and Research

To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.

Education
9
Tennesseans for Quality Early Education

To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children from birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.

Education
10
Parent Advocates for Choice in Education Foundation

To conduct public policy research on matters affecting educational choice and to propose approaches to public policy issues related to educational choice. To conduct nonpartisan public policy research and to distribute policy studies on…

Education
11
Technology for Education Consortium

To bring transparency, efficiency, and collaboration to k-12 schools engaged in evaulating and purchasing edtech products and services. we believe that greater transparency and better information will allow school districts to improve…

Education
12
Contemporary Policy Institute
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Urban League of Louisiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%20%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%52%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
3/47
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/39
Grantees still filing
17/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INC — $6,223,500 · EducationSCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INCParents for Educational Freedom in NC — $4,715,000 · EducationParents for Educational Freedom in NCINSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC — $2,240,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INCEMPOWER ILLINOIS — $1,280,000 · EducationEMPOWER ILLINOISSCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC — $650,000 · Education+18 more — $2,420,179 · Education+18 moreALABAMA OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $882,630 · OtherALABAMA OPPOR…EMPOWER KENTUCKY PARENTS INC — $500,000 · OtherEMPOWER KENTU…KEEP KIDS FIRST — $375,000 · OtherKEEP KIDS FIR…PARTNERS FOR EDUCATIONAL FREEDOM IN NORTH CAROLINA — $200,000 · OtherPARTNERS FOR …BEACON CENTER — $136,500 · OtherBEACON CENTER+9 more — $422,500 · Other+9 moreEMPOWER MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $180,000 · Human ServicesINDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE INC — $145,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA — $115,000 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS CLARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE — $25,000 · Human ServicesPalmetto Promise Institute — $255,000 · HealthHOOSIERS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC — $120,000 · Community ImprovementSCISSORTAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP — $95,000 · Community ImprovementSouth Carolina Opportunity Now — $140,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Public BenefitENVIRONMENTALISTS FOR EFFECTIVE EDUCATION INC — $15,488 · Environment
Education$17,528,679Other$2,516,630Human Services$465,000Health$255,000Community Improvement$215,000Public Benefit$165,000Environment$15,488

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INC — $6,223,500 over 8y, 80% of budgetParents for Educational Freedom in NC — $4,715,000 over 8y, 64% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC — $2,240,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetEMPOWER ILLINOIS — $1,280,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC — $650,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetCHILDREN'S EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI — $560,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetEMPOWER KENTUCKY PARENTS INC — $500,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetEDCHOICE KENTUCKY INC — $448,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetKEEP KIDS FIRST — $375,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIPS OF NEBRASKA — $350,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetINVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $291,662 over 1y, 39% of budgetPalmetto Promise Institute — $255,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetMY SC EDUCATION — $200,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetEMPOWER MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetEDUCATION FREEDOM ALABAMA — $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE INC — $145,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSouth Carolina Opportunity Now — $140,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetHOOSIERS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC — $120,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA — $115,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSCISSORTAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP — $95,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetLet MI Kids Learn — $80,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE THOMAS JEFFERSON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY — $65,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIOWA ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetASSOCIATED PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS OF LOUISIANA — $35,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA FAMILIES UNITED FOR EDUCATION INCORPORATED — $27,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetLAS VEGAS CLARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPA FAMILIES FOR EDUCATION CHOICE — $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA NON-PUBLIC EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $21,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetIOWA ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $20,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetYoung Voices — $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCATHOLIC MEMPHIS URBAN SCHOOLS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National School Choic…EdChoice IncAmerican Federation f…Walton Family Foundat…The Seminar Network I…Donors Trust IncLovett & Ruth Peters …Yes Every Kid IncState Policy NetworkCampaign for Great Pu…Beth and Ravenel Curr…Enterprise Holdings F…
National School Choice Awareness Foundation IncFL34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National School Choice Awareness Foundation Inc · EdChoice Inc · American Federation for Children Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The Seminar Network Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Lovett & Ruth Peters Foundation · Yes Every Kid Inc · State Policy Network · Campaign for Great Public Schools · Beth and Ravenel Curry Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Federation for Children Growth Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines