Skip to content
American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc

To provide financial support to the various charitable activities, programs, and projects conducted and administrated in the united states of america and in the state of israel.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$249k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.9MHealth$428kHuman Services$265kInternational$158kEducation$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $509,195, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,132,823 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,623,628 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $355k
$42,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC$248,555
FRIENDS OF HARIM INC$106,900
KOLLELEI HASHAS INC$48,960
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEFA CHAIM VRACHAMIM$42,000
CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED$25,500
CONGREGATION ADAS CHASIDIM INC$24,280
MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YAD ELIEZER INC: $158k → 11%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $360k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $249k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $50k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEFA CHAIM V'RACHAMIM: $200k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEFA CHAIM VRACHAMIM: $42k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $2.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.6M · 100% · 27 grants

Stated purpose: TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 18 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +108% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
30

Total granted

$3.0M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+9%

Still filing today

28%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AY
    AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $659k · revenue +678%
  • AF
    American Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m
    2× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +247% · 70% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HARIM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CD
    CONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BP
    one grant, 2019 · $712k
  • CM
    CONGREGATION MAHARI SRUG INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • KM
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
2
American Friends of Shovu Yisroel Inc

To provide grants to jewish religious organization in need.

Religion
3
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
6
Ohr Avrohom and Moshe Inc

We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.

Public Benefit
7
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
8
American Friends of Orchot Torah DRav Shteinman Inc

To provide financial support to Yeshivat Orchot Torah, an educational institution located in Israel, and to other educational institutions of higher learning in the U.S. and Israel

Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Birkat Haaretz Inc

The purpose of Birkat Haaretz is to promote the laws of shmitta accordance to Jewish law.

Religion
10
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
12
American Friends of Rinat Aharon

To provide charitable assistance to needy individuals and families

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Katten Muchin Rosenman Llp Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BP: $711,780 · OtherCONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BPCONGREGATION MAHARI SRUG INC: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MAHARI SRUG INCCONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ INC: $469,050 · OtherCONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ INCTALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEY: $431,085 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEYKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust: $400,000 · OtherKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & TrustMIFAL HACHESED SHEFA CHAYIM VRACHMIM: $207,774 · OtherTIFERES YOEL INC: $180,000 · OtherCONG SHEVES ACHIM: $146,250 · Other+30 more: $1,260,388 · Other+30 moreAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $658,555 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMAN…American Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m: $242,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $158,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF …FRIENDS OF HARIM INC: $149,900 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel: $110,000 · ReligionJEWISH LIFELINE NETWORK INC: $28,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,020 · ReligionEZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $118,800 · InternationalMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $25,892 · EducationJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$4,306,327Human Services$1,058,555Religion$289,920International$118,800Education$25,892Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $658,555 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m: $242,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $158,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF HARIM INC: $149,900 over 2y, 12% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $118,800 over 3y, 15% of budgetAmerican Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel: $110,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetJEWISH LIFELINE NETWORK INC: $28,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $25,892 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION TIFERETH TOMOR DVORA SFARD INC: $2,020 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds EZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LIFELINE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Rostrust FoundationDonors Fund IncMosdos Sanz of MonseyZcm Foundation TrustThe Margareten Family…American Friends of R…Igcf IncVyazreim IncZichron Simcha DsassovAmerican Friends of B…
The Ojc FundNY46.6× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Rostrust Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Mosdos Sanz of Monsey · Zcm Foundation Trust · The Margareten Family Foundation · American Friends of Rct Inc · Igcf Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home