· Public charity
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine
Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $147,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $240,276 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $92,976 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION INC | $15,500 |
| NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | $15,000 |
| ARKANSAS COLLEGE OF HEALTH EDUCATION | $12,500 |
| NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $12,500 |
| AT STILL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES INC | $10,000 |
| GME TRANSFORMATION | $10,000 |
| ALLIANCE OF INDEPENDENT ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS (AIAMC) | $8,800 |
| ROCKY VISTA UNIVERSITY LLC | $7,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND | $7,500 |
| TOURO UNIVERSITY NEW YORK | $7,500 |
| PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| TOURO UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA | $7,500 |
| STUDENT NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES9× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +15%- AOAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +25%
- NYNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY2× · 2024–2025 · $23k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- AMAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +64%
- TGThe George Washington Universitygraduated2× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +30%
- EVEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINEone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…
American college of occupational and environmental medicine (acoem) provides leadership to promote optimal health and safety of workers, workplaces and environments by: educating health professionals and the public; stimulating research;…
Improve health care and population health by assessing and enhancing the quality of resident and fellow physicians' education through advancements in accreditation and education.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
To teach, advocate, and research the science, art and philosophy of osteopathic medicine, emphasizing the integration of osteopathic principles, practices and manipulative treatment in patient care.
As the premier community for osteopathic internists, acoi provides leadership, networking, and education to help our members be successful and stay true to why they pursued medicine.
The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Osteopathic Association and the most unlike its peers is Gme Transformation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS COLLEGES OF HEALTH EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds GME Transformation ↗
- Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF INDEPENDENT ACADEMIC MEDICAL ↗
- Who funds EDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ADVISORS FOR THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENT NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT RELATIONS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.