Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education

Aacte elevates education and educator preparation through research, professional practice, advocacy, and collaboration.

$52k
Granted FY2017
5
Itemized grants FY2017
5
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2017
$41k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2017
$8,300
Largest grant, FY2017
$8,850
States reached, FY2017
5
Total assets, FY2017
$12M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
McPherson College$8,8501n/a
Tennessee Association for Colleges of Teacher Edu Belmont University$8,7001n/a
Kentucky Association of Colleges for Teacher Edu$8,3001n/a
Washington Associate of Colleges for Teacher Education$8,0001n/a
Oklahoma Association of Colleges for Teacher Education$7,3271n/a

Compare American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education with peer funders

About American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education

How much does American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education give?
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education reported 5 itemized grants totaling $41,177, out of $52,427 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Education (81%), Public Benefit (19%).
Who are American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: McPherson College ($9k), Tennessee Association for Colleges of Teacher Edu Belmont University ($9k), Kentucky Association of Colleges for Teacher Edu ($8k).
Where is American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education based?
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home