Skip to content

· Public charity

American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

Educational association that advances responsible laboratory animal care and use.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$377kAnimals$236kHealth$172kFood & Nutrition$29kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $127,343, the rows itemized in this filing. The $132,445 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,102 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$21,650
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$50,000
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$34,600
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$21,650
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$7,500
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE$6,944
MCMASTER UNIVERSITY$6,649
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $22k → 8%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $8k → 14%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $35k → 8%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY: $48k → 11%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $7k → 17%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $50k → 12%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $48k → 19%WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%AALAS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $6k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $35k → 10%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7k → 9%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $7k → 20%MID-WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 7%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY: $7k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 23%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $6k → 8%SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $5k → 11%AALAS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 23%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $6k → 8%AALAS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INC: $24k → 8%ASLAP FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AALAS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ASLAP FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ASLAP FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of American Association for Laboratory Animal Science’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

American Association for Laboratory Animal Sciencelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 5 repeat orgs$498k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
22

Total granted

$253k
$427k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    2× · 2017–2020 · $75k
  • AF
    AALAS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $70k · revenue -50%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $53k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $80k · revenue +51%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
  • LJ
    LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY
    one grant, 2019 · $48k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is Aalas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADOMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $50,000 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINACENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $47,974 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $47,882 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER: $36,067 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDERIndiana University School of Medicine: $34,058 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $32,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEESTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $29,054 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERCHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INC: $23,539 · Other+12 more: $79,467 · Other+12 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $80,301 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCornell University: $53,231 · EducationCornell UniversityTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $39,863 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCAT…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $34,600 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STA…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $33,551 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyASLAP FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,164 · Education+3 more: $22,407 · Education+3 moreAALAS FOUNDATION: $70,000 · AnimalsAALAS FOU…The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $5,026 · Science & Tech
Other$455,041Education$289,117Animals$70,000Science & Tech$5,026

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $80,301 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAALAS FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetCornell University: $53,231 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $47,882 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $39,863 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $34,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $33,551 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASLAP FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,164 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $7,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $5,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AALAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ASLAP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Association for Laboratory Animal Science funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Association for Laboratory Animal Science?

Find your warmest path to American Association for Laboratory Animal Science through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Association for Laboratory Animal Science’s filings →

More from the funding graph