Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Agape Foundation Inc

Provide social services to low income recipients and support low-income housing projects in arkansas, mississippi, louisiana and texas by providing affordable housing and social services.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$958k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Housing & Shelter$20M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $999k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$213,218
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC$958,040
AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC$338,775
AGAPE COLINAS INC$260,651
AGAPE WATERFORD INC$213,667
AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC$213,218
AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC$176,658
AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC$165,133
AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC$153,980
AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC$76,664
AGAPE GULFGATE INC$9,016
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $2.8M → 16%AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC: $1.4M → 16%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $1.3M → 16%AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC: $1.1M → 16%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $958k → 16%AGAPE COLINAS INC: $951k → 16%AGAPE WATERFORD INC: $853k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $843k → 16%AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC: $729k → 16%AGAPE 2015 PORTFOLIO INC: $660k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $632k → 16%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $599k → 16%AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC: $598k → 16%AGAPE COLINAS INC: $475k → 16%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $428k → 16%AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $416k → 16%AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC: $398k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $341k → 16%AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC: $339k → 16%AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC: $295k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $271k → 16%AGAPE COLINAS INC: $261k → 16%AGAPE COLINAS INC: $247k → 16%AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $234k → 16%AGAPE WATERFORD INC: $214k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $213k → 16%AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC: $201k → 16%AGAPE WILLIAMCREST INC: $184k → 16%AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $177k → 16%AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC: $165k → 16%AGAPE WATERFORD INC: $164k → 16%AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC: $154k → 16%AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC: $132k → 16%AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC: $121k → 16%AGAPE RAYMONDVILLE PROPERTIES INC: $115k → 16%AGAPE RAYMONDVILLE PROPERTIES INC: $107k → 16%AGAPE WILLIAMCREST INC: $100k → 16%AGAPE UVALDE PROPERTIES INC: $94k → 16%AGAPE WATERFORD INC: $93k → 16%AGAPE UVALDE PROPERTIES INC: $90k → 16%AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC: $77k → 16%AGAPE RAYMONDVILLE PROPERTIES INC: $72k → 16%AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC: $55k → 16%AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC: $55k → 16%AGAPE PARK LAKE LLC: $54k → 16%AGAPE PARK LAKE LLC: $36k → 16%AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC: $25k → 16%AGAPE GULFGATE INC: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$20M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    AGAPE BERRENDO-LAUREL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +12% · 36% of their budget
  • AM
    AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +5%
  • AC
    AGAPE COLINAS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +6%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    American Agape Foundation Inc

    Provide social services to low income recipients and support low-income housing projects in arkansas, mississippi, louisiana and texas by providing affordable housing and social services.

    Housing & Shelter
    2
    American Opportunity for Housing Inc

    Operation of low-income housing apartments and delivery of social services.

    Housing & Shelter
    3
    Ahepa 29 Inc

    The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.

    Unclassified
    4
    Ahepa 39 Inc

    The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.

    Housing & Shelter
    5
    Villa Agave Corporation

    Providing apartments for low-income and disabled individuals in the phoenix area.

    6
    Foresight Affordable Housing Inc

    Foresight affordable housing, inc. was created to provide quality affordable housing to low income individuals and families.

    Housing & Shelter
    7
    Ahepa 23-Iii Inc

    The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.

    Housing & Shelter
    8
    Family Gateway Affordable Housing Inc

    Family gateway affordable housing, inc. (fgah) is operated, supervised, and controlled by family gateway, inc. (fg), a texas nonprofit for the purpose of building and operating housing units available to low income tenants. fgah works with…

    Housing & Shelter
    9
    Housing for Hope

    Housing programs

    Housing & Shelter
    10
    Ahepa One Inc

    The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.

    Housing & Shelter
    11
    St Ann's Apartments Inc
    12
    Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

    To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

    Housing & Shelter

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Uvalde Properties Inc and the most unlike its peers is Agape 2015 Portfolio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    9/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC — $6,368,212 · Community ImprovementAGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INCAGAPE BERRENDO-LAUREL INC — $2,649,155 · Community ImprovementAGAPE BERRENDO-LAUREL INCAGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC — $2,501,470 · Community ImprovementAGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INCAGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC — $2,021,705 · Community ImprovementAGAPE MEADOWCREEK INCAGAPE WATERFORD PORTFOLIO INC — $1,322,945 · Community ImprovementAGAPE WATERFORD PORTFOLIO INCAGAPE LAS PALMAS INC — $554,722 · Community Improvement+1 more — $22,900 · Community ImprovementAGAPE COLINAS INC — $1,933,219 · OtherAGAPE COLINAS INCAGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC — $826,773 · OtherAGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INCAGAPE 2015 PORTFOLIO INC — $759,446 · OtherAGAPE 2015 PORTFOLIO INCAGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC — $407,171 · OtherAGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INCAGAPE WILLIAMCREST INC — $283,741 · OtherAGAPE WILLIAMCREST INCAGAPE UVALDE PROPERTIES INC — $184,221 · Other
    Community Improvement$15,441,109Other$4,394,571

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC — $6,368,212 over 6y, 76% of budgetAGAPE BERRENDO-LAUREL INC — $2,649,155 over 5y, 36% of budgetAGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC — $2,501,470 over 6y, 44% of budgetAGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC — $2,021,705 over 3y, 11% of budgetAGAPE COLINAS INC — $1,933,219 over 4y, 13% of budgetAGAPE WATERFORD PORTFOLIO INC — $1,322,945 over 4y, 15% of budgetAGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC — $826,773 over 3y, 20% of budgetAGAPE 2015 PORTFOLIO INC — $759,446 over 4y, 44% of budgetAGAPE LAS PALMAS INC — $554,722 over 4y, 55% of budgetAGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC — $407,171 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetAGAPE WILLIAMCREST INC — $283,741 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAGAPE UVALDE PROPERTIES INC — $184,221 over 2y, 16% of budgetAGAPE GULFGATE INC — $22,900 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization American Agape Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to American Agape Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to American Agape Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph