Loading…
· Public charity
AMERICAN AGAPE FOUNDATION INC
Provide social services to low income recipients and support low-income housing projects in arkansas, mississippi, louisiana and texas by providing affordable housing and social services.
$2.6M
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$958k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Community Improvement$15MOther$4.4M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
debt forgiveness
2020
debt forgiveness
2021
reservesadvanceunit propertyconsisting unitsapartment consistingunits locateddebt forgiveness
2022
reservesadvanceconsisting unitsunit propertyapartment consistingunits locateddebt forgiveness
2023
houstonconcordadvancesan antoniodifferent apartmentunit propertyantonio different
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $999k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$213,218
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
- AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC$958,040
- AGAPE BERRENDOLAUREL INC$338,775
- AGAPE COLINAS INC$260,651
- AGAPE WATERFORD INC$213,667
- AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC$213,218
- AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC$176,658
- AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC$165,133
- AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC$153,980
- AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC$76,664
- AGAPE GULFGATE INC$9,016
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
13
0
Total granted
$20M
$0
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC6× · 2019–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +19% · 76% of their budget
- ARAGAPE RAYMONDVILLE PROPERTIES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +38% · 36% of their budget
- ACAGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +31% · 44% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
American Agape Foundation Inc
Provide social services to low income recipients and support low-income housing projects in arkansas, mississippi, louisiana and texas by providing affordable housing and social services.
Housing & Shelter
2
American Opportunity for
Operation of low-income housing apartments and delivery of social services.
Housing & Shelter
3
Los Angeles Accessible Apartments C
—
4
Ahepa 23-Iii Inc
The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.
Housing & Shelter
5
Austin Affordable Housing
To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.
Housing & Shelter
6
Ahepa 39 Inc
The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.
Housing & Shelter
7
St Paul Homes
The mission of st. pauls homes, formed and sustained by the judeo-christian faith, and historically related to the united church of christ is to provide meaning and richness to the life of each resident and health care services for those…
Human Services
8
Villa Agave Corporation
Providing apartments for low-income and disabled individuals in the phoenix area.
—
9
Family Gateway Affordable Housing Inc
Family gateway affordable housing, inc. (fgah) is operated, supervised, and controlled by family gateway, inc. (fg), a texas nonprofit for the purpose of building and operating housing units available to low income tenants. fgah works with…
Housing & Shelter
10
Ahepa One Inc
The corporation was organized to construct, own, and operate an affordable housing apartment community.
Housing & Shelter
11
Foresight Affordable Housing Inc
Affordable housing provider that provides management services and project oversight in an effort to provide quality affordable housing to lower income individuals and families.
Housing & Shelter
12
Agape Homes Cdc
To provide families in the community an affordable option for home ownership
Housing & Shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Uvalde Properties Inc and the most unlike its peers is Agape 2015 Portfolio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$15,441,109Other$4,394,571
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE RAYMONDVILLE PROPERTIES INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CANAAN TOWERS INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE MEADOWCREEK INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE COLINAS INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE WATERFORD INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE PARK LAKE LLC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE LAS PALMAS INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE PERRIN SQUARE INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE WILLIAMCREST INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE UVALDE PROPERTIES INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE GULFGATE INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation AMERICAN AGAPE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 352545540 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AGAPE HIMBOLA MANOR INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 76% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to American Agape Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to American Agape Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines