Skip to content
American Academy of Implant Dentist Ry Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Academy of Implant Dentist Ry Foundation

To further the science of oral implantology through research and education, and to support the delivery of implant care through charitable efforts

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$267kEducation$134kHealth$32k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $50,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,228 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $54,228 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO$25,000
UMD BALTIMORE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $47k → 16%ALEXANDER MAGALLENES: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NY AT BUFFALO: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $25k → 20%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%ADA SCIENCE & RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $25k → 23%RUTGERS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $7k → 16%UMD BALTIMORE: $25k → 19%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
NC
MS
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $50k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$50k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: DENTAL RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $75,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTERUNIVERSITY OF NY AT BUFFALO: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NY AT BUFFALOALEXANDER MAGALLENES: $25,000 · OtherALEXANDER MAGALLENESUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOADA Science and Research Institute LLC: $25,000 · OtherADA Science and Research Institute LLCGRIFFITH UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherGRIFFITH UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKUniversity of Michigan: $25,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $24,950 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $17,140 · Other+1 more: $6,521 · OtherTrustees of Tufts College: $47,446 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $25,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYTrustees of Dartmouth College: $25,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $11,842 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORN…
Other$348,611Education$134,288

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $47,446 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $25,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $11,842 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Academy of Implant Dentist Ry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Academy of Implant Dentist Ry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Academy of Implant Dentist Ry’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home