Skip to content

· Public charity

America Viva Alliance Corp

The Organization connects other nonprofit organizations from different origins to materialize together top-class artistic events for the benefit of the most disadvantaged children of the Americas.This is accomplished by providing charitable distributions to qualifying non profits

$108k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$120kInternational$31kCrime & Legal$22kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $80,241, the rows itemized in this filing. The $107,673 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,432 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$10,018
Median grant
2
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW LAND THEATRICALS INC$57,918
COLOMBIANITOS INC$10,018
HEALTHY BELLAS FOUNDATION$6,880
MIAMI CHILDREN CHORUS INC$5,425
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Friends of the Children of Venezuela: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 3 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$151k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-81%
-44%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEmploymentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    New Land Theatricals Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $114k · revenue -30% · 30% of their budget
  • CI
    COLOMBIANITOS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue -85%
  • HB
    HEALTHY BELLAS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue -81%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF VENEZUELA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -83%
  • NF
    NOBIS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • TS
    THE SALESIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childarise

Charitable work for children

International
2
Colegio Kids

Provide scholarships to needy children in Dominican Republic

Education
3
Clowns to the Rescue Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Big Papis Kids
Philanthropy
5
Honduras Child Alliance
Philanthropy
6
They Often Cry Outreach

Imoriving the lives of undeprivileged, at risk and orphned children in the carriben

International
7
Socio-Cultural Afro-American Foundation Inc

Our mission is to provide education for children that living in extreme poverty, to support their right to full participation in formal primary education and to achieve access to education for all. Social-Cultural Afro-American…

—
8
Foundation for Argentinean Development
Philanthropy
9
Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts Inc
Education
10
Kids At the Crossroads Peru

To help break the cycle of poverty in Ayacucho, Peru through education.

International
11
Hope Life Global

We offer assistance to girls who were exploited poverty stricken victims and refugees from Cuba and Haiti

Human Services
12
Hope Project International

Helping impoverished students receive an education as well assisting their families with basic needs in central america including food and water shelter education and medical care

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nobis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Land Theatricals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New Land Theatricals Inc: $114,324 · Arts & CultureNew Land Theatricals IncMIAMI CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $5,425 · Arts & CultureCOLOMBIANITOS INC: $21,542 · InternationalCOLOMBIANITO…NOBIS FOUNDATION INC: $9,182 · PhilanthropyNOBIS FOU…THE SALESIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION INC: $7,752 · PhilanthropyTHE SALES…HEALTHY BELLAS FOUNDATION INC: $15,405 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF VENEZUELA INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCLOSING THE GAP FOUNDATION INC: $6,962 · Other
Arts & Culture$119,749International$21,542Philanthropy$16,934Employment$15,405Human Services$15,000Other$6,962

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Land Theatricals Inc: $114,324 over 2y, 30% of budgetCOLOMBIANITOS INC: $21,542 over 2y, 19% of budgetHEALTHY BELLAS FOUNDATION INC: $15,405 over 2y, 19% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF VENEZUELA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNOBIS FOUNDATION INC: $9,182 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE SALESIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION INC: $7,752 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCLOSING THE GAP FOUNDATION INC: $6,962 over 1y, 18% of budgetMIAMI CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $5,425 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization America Viva Alliance Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from America Viva Alliance Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to America Viva Alliance Corp?

    Find your warmest path to America Viva Alliance Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on America Viva Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph