Skip to content

· Private foundation

Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$924k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$710k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MEducation$190kAnimals$80kEnvironment$60kHealth$30kArts & Culture$20kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $710k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS$709,806
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$50,000
EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$30,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$25,000
BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
UNIVERSTY OF MICHIGAN - EVA FELDMAN$20,000
HENRY FORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
HOUSE OF HOUNDS USA$10,000
HEALTH CORPS INC$5,000
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
GREAT LAKES CENTER OF THE ARTS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE EATING DISORDER$5,000
NEW DETROIT$5,000
KRACH INSTITUTE FOR TECH DIPLOMACY AT PURDUE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ARAB AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $5k → 21%ARAB AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
IN
CA
UT
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$850 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$850

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +44%
  • HI
    HEALTHCORPS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • DC
    DETROIT CATHOLIC CENTRAL
    one grant, 2025 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $350
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
3
Michigan Colleges Alliance

Michigan Colleges Alliance is a collective of excellent independent colleges and universities located throughout Michigan. MCA helps students pursue their educational goals by organizing on campus tours, funding scholarships and connecting…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
8
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
9
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
12
Companions and Animals for Reform and Equity Inc

To address organizational and personal biases within animal welfare. to bring diverse voices to animal welfare while also advocating for a more inclusive path to pet adoption. to use evidence-based tools, narratives and insights to inspire…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $1,008,806 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTSBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSTY OF MICHIGAN - EVA FELDMAN: $40,000 · Other+9 more: $82,850 · Other+9 moreMarquette University: $100,000 · EducationTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentHumane World for Animals Inc: $50,000 · AnimalsMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsHEALTHCORPS INC: $10,000 · HealthARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S: $10,000 · Human ServicesGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJAMESTOWN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · International
Other$1,181,656Education$100,000Environment$60,000Animals$60,000Health$10,000Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCORPS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DETROIT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds NEW DETROIT INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amb John Rakolta Jr and Terry L Rakolta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph