Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alyce J & Ann J Metka Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$593kHealth$226kYouth Development$91kArts & Culture$28kCivil Rights$10kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLESSING HOUSE$30,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES$25,000
GOOD KNIGHTS OF LORAIN COUNTY$20,000
RIVEON$15,000
OHIO GUIDESTONE$11,500
BIG BROTHERS & SISTERS$10,000
FILIPINO AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF OHIO$8,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE$6,500
LORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BLESSING HOUSE: $30k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $30k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $30k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $27k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $27k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $27k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $26k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$969k · 15 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$969k
$10k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BLESSING HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $221k · revenue +123%
  • O
    OhioGuidestone
    7× · 2019–2025 · $78k · revenue +35%
  • NA
    NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oberlin Early Childhood Center

The organization operates a childhood center in oberlin, ohio for up tp 100 children ages six weeks to five years old. the center provides a unique, child centered campus for anyone in need regardless of financial ability.

Human Services
2
Lorain County Safe Harbor Corp

The organization provides a comprehensive range of family focused services for lorain county, ohio victims of domestic violence. we endeavor to be a part of collaborative community

Human Services
3
Oberlin Community Services Council

Oberlin community services council is a responsive community organization that provides direct assistance, referrals, outreach and educational support to lorain county residents who struggle to meet basic needs.

Human Services
4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
6
Advocates for Kids

Advocates for Kids is committed to providing service and/or supporting organizations that serve children by providing experiences that empower them to realize their full potential. Advocates for Kids envisions children achieving a clearer…

Youth Development
7
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

8
Loving Hands Childrens Home

Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.

Housing & Shelter
9
Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra Inc

The Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra provides exceptional musical education through a variety of performance opportunities for young musicians of all backgrounds in an inclusive community of learning and growth.

10
Family Promise of Northwest Oh

The organization provides homeless prevention services, emergency shelter and basic needs, housing solutions and family and early childhood services to families in a housing crisis

Human Services
11
Ohio Afterschool Network

Oan convenes stakeholders to advocate for support and facilitate the development of quality, sustainability, out-of-school time programs for ohio's children and youth.

12
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is OhioGuidestone and the most unlike its peers is Filipino American Foundation of Ohio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES — $202,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICESLORAIN COUNTY ALCOHOL & DRUG ADDICTION — $138,500 · OtherLORAIN COUNTY ALCOHOL & DRUG ADDICTIONBIG BROTHERS & SISTERS — $83,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & SISTERSMERCY RESOURCE MOTHERS PROGRAM — $45,500 · OtherMERCY RESOURCE MOTHERS PROGRAMRIVEON — $35,000 · OtherRIVEONMAKE-A-WISH — $23,000 · OtherLORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $22,000 · Other+4 more — $30,000 · OtherBLESSING HOUSE — $220,500 · Human ServicesBLESSING HOUSEOhioGuidestone — $78,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsGOOD KNIGHTS INC — $40,500 · Public BenefitFILIPINO AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF OHIO — $8,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentOBERLIN CHORISTERS — $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$579,000Human Services$220,500Health$78,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Public Benefit$40,500Education$8,000Youth Development$7,500Arts & Culture$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLESSING HOUSE — $220,500 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetOhioGuidestone — $78,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD KNIGHTS INC — $40,500 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetLORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $22,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFILIPINO AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF OHIO — $8,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOBERLIN CHORISTERS — $6,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLESSING HOUSE
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE
  • Who funds GOOD KNIGHTS INC
  • Who funds LORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC
  • Who funds FILIPINO AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF OHIO
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO
  • Who funds OBERLIN CHORISTERS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Lorain CountyOH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Lorain County · The Nord Family Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Norton Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alyce J & Ann J Metka Charitable Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph