Skip to content

· Private foundation

Althouse Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$145kHealth$29k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,908
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$33,815
READING HOSPITAL$16,908
DICKINSON COLLEGE$16,908
ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$16,908
KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$16,908
ALBRIGHT COLLEGE$16,908
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$16,908
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $17k → 8%ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $17k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $34k → 16%PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 22%ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $8k → 8%ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $17k → 22%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $17k → 11%READING HOSPITAL: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 4 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$94k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DICKINSON COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +8%
  • AC
    ALBRIGHT COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +40%
  • RH
    READING HOSPITAL
    2× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • PU
    PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
2
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
5
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
6
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
10
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia University; the most unlike its peers is St Joseph Medical Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DICKINSON COLLEGE: $24,487 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGEALBRIGHT COLLEGE: $23,398 · EducationALBRIGHT COLLEGETHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $16,908 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $6,418 · EducationPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $33,815 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $22,908 · OtherALVERNIA UNIVERSITYST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONREADING HOSPITAL: $22,908 · HealthREADING HOSPIT…KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $16,908 · Arts & CultureKUTZTOWN UN…
Education$71,211Other$62,723Health$22,908Arts & Culture$16,908

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $24,487 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBRIGHT COLLEGE: $23,398 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING HOSPITAL: $22,908 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $22,908 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $16,908 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $16,908 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $6,418 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wyomissing Foundation IncPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Althouse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Althouse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Althouse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph