· Private foundation
Alternative Residences Two Inc
STATES INTERNAL REVENUE LAW (THE "INTERNAL REVENUE CODE"), INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROVIDING SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS, AND PROVIDING FUNDING SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INSTITUTIONS THAT SERVICE INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $543k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARC OF OHIO | $198,400 |
| BELMONT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COM | $135,000 |
| BELMONT COUNTY BOARD OF DD | $100,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OHIO | $60,000 |
| BELMONT COUNTY SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $50,000 |
| OPRA | $40,000 |
| RECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION | $36,440 |
| TRI STATE MILITARY VETERANS MUSEUM | $30,000 |
| TRAC OHIO VALLEY DTD | $20,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ARC OF OHIO INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +966%
- RURECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $269k · revenue +36%
- SSSAVE22 SAVE222× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- DSDOWNS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRone grant, 2021 · $100k
- BVBELLAIRE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2022 · $87k
- DDSACOone grant, 2024 · $83k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Alternative Residences Two Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alternative Residences Two Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alternative Residences Two Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alternative Residences Two Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Alternative Residences Two’s filings →