How much did ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC grant in FY2025?

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC reported 22 grants totaling $521,584 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC based?

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC is based in GA.

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC

See schedule o:to provide quality, efficient, and effective healthcare solutions to all federal, state, business, and industry purchasers of healthcare services and to promote to charitable, scientific research and education activities.

$522k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$60k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

planpartnershipsdementiatraining

2020

keepcovid pandemicconferencestraining

2021

covid pandemicnamiconferences

2022

professional externalexternal scholarshipsnursingstudentsmedical

2023

targetedmanagingdevelop professionalprofessional desiredesire specializepersonfood

2025

participantsfinancialpersonsworkplaceleadersoffercare educational

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k18 grants · $311k
$50k–250k3 grants · $180k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$59M

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIONAL KIDNEY$60,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$60,000
ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION$60,000
NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIP$26,100
GEORGIA DIABETES COALITION$20,000
LEADINGAGE FLORIDA$20,000
TENNESSEE KIDNEY FOUNDATION$20,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE ON AGING$20,000
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF GA$20,000
KENTUCKY HEALTH CARE$20,000
MISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION$20,000
GEORGIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$20,000
ATHENS YMCA$20,000
GEORGIA HEALTHY FAMILY ALLIANCE$20,000
OPEN HAND ATLANTA$16,334

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.1M · 28 repeat orgs$409k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%

+50%

Still filing today

79%

83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NK
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION
5× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +18%
NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS
6× · 2019–2025 · $182k · revenue +57%
AK
ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +39%

Funded once

NK
NATIONAL KIDNEY - NC
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -32%
KS
KIDNEY SOLUTIONSgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +128%
NK
NATIONAL KIDNEY - SC
one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

East Georgia Cancer Coalition

Cancer Prevention Education Provide the region with prevention education and information, early detection methodologies, referrals, and follow-up

Education

Medical Association of Georgia

The foundation is a public charity enabling georgia physicians to support and engage in charitable and educational projects affecting medicine and public health.

Health

Leadingage North Carolina

Through advocacy, education, innovation and collaboration, the association provides expanded possibilities for aging, value to its members, and leadership to the field of aging.

Human Services

Northwest Georgia Healthcare Partnership

The northwest georgia healthcare partnership's mission is to improve community health through collaboration, innovative ideas, and positive action.

—

Georgia Pharmacy Association Inc

To promote and enhance the profession of pharmacy and the practice standards of its practitioners. Further, the Association shall endeavor to heighten the public's perception of the profession of pharmacy and pharmacists, and to promote…

—

American Health Care Association

The american health care association is a non-profit federation of affiliate state health organizations, together representing more than 14,000 non-profit and for-profit nursing, assisted living, developmentally - disabled, and sub-acute…

—

Kentucky Nurses Association

To advance the nursing profession and work for the improvement of health standards and the availability of healthcare services for citizens of the commonwealth. kna will accomplish this goal through fostering high standards of nursing and…

Community Improvement

The Arh Foundation for Healthier

To carry out charitable activities on behalf of appalachian regional healthcare, inc.

Health

Georgia Hospital Association Research and Education Foundation

Educational and research activities that help improve hospital patient care.

—

Okefenokee Health Inc

Public charity whose purpose is to promote community health through activities designed to ensure and improve access to healthcare for all individuals in the community and to promote healthcare and wellness in the communities.

—

Georgia Center for Oncology Research and

To develop, implement, and evaluate programs that improve the quality, cost-effectiveness, and organization of cancer care and research in Georgia.

Health

National Kidney Foundation of Utah

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ncha Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope House of Hospitality. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/58

the rest of the field

16%

9,180/58,243

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

46/49

Grantees still filing

34/49

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,133,661Health$939,959Education$175,000Human Services$112,688Food & Nutrition$96,334Philanthropy$50,300Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for MississippiMS13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Mississippi · Emory University · The Community Foundation for Greater · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GEORGIA DIABETES COALITION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up +87% since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 261101570 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GEORGIA DIABETES COALITION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 85% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alliant Health Group Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alliant Health Group Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alliant Health Group Inc?

More from the funding graph

ALLIANT HEALTH GROUP INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alliant Health Group Inc?

More from the funding graph