· Public charity
Alliance for Patient Access
At its core, the ALLIANCE FOR PATIENT ACCESS is a national network of healthcare professionals dedicated to promoting the benefits of patient-centered health care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $141,077 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $150,077 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT ACCESS | $60,000 |
| GOUT SUPPORT GROUP OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES | $15,000 |
| LUPUS AND ALLIED DISEASES ASSOCIATION | $10,077 |
| NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUDNATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCAMPAIGN TO PROTECT PATIENT HEALTH5× · 2018–2022 · $587k · revenue +183% · 78% of their budget
- NCNATIONAL COALITION FOR INFANT HEALTH5× · 2018–2023 · $380k · revenue +275% · 72% of their budget
- GSGOUT SUPPORT GROUP OF AMERICA3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +34%
- DCDERMA CARE ACCESS NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +480% · 100% of their budget
- CNCLINICAL NEUROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue ×1,185
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kfiaf is a patient advocacy group providing education about the rare disease kcnma1 linked channelopathy to families and healthcare workers, as well as helping to promote and facilitate research in this area. we communicate through…
AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.
The global alliance for patient access (gafpa) is an international platform for healthcare providers and patient advocates seeking to raise awareness about the benefits of patient-centered healthcare.
To educate the general public, healthcare providers, patients and decision makers on what Neuropathy is and to help Neuropathy patients obtain access to individualized treatments.
At its core, the alliance for patient access is a national network of healthcare professionals dedicated to promoting the benefits of patient-centered health care. afpa accomplishes its mission through educating clinicians on issues…
To improve health status and quality of care through nurse practitioner innovations in research, education, health policy, service, and philanthropy. NPHF focuses on making high quality, effective care accessible.
To enhance human health and wellness by advancing the profession of naturopathic medicine.
The national patient advocate foundation, the advocacy affiliate of the patient advocate foundation, represents the patient voice, both the powerful stories of individuals and the collective needs of the community. our programs are…
To prevent and control chronic diseases, also called non-communicable diseases or NCDs, in the region of the Americas by promoting an environment conducive to health, well-being, social and economic development. This mission is…
The international pediatric nephrology association, inc. (ipna) is a membership organization that has an international membership of over 1,000 pediatric nephrologists from 89 countries worldwide. ipna promotes knowledge and communication…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campaign to Protect Patient Health and the most unlike its peers is Clinical Neurological Society of America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT ACCESS ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT PATIENT HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COALITION FOR INFANT HEALTH ↗
- Who funds GOUT SUPPORT GROUP OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES ↗
- Who funds LUPUS AND ALLIED DISEASES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DERMA CARE ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CLINICAL NEUROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alliance for Patient Access funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alliance for Patient Access?
Find your warmest path to Alliance for Patient Access through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.