· Private foundation
Allene Reuss Memorial Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k13 grants · $355k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $604k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINGS BAY YM-YWHA | $100,000 |
| VISIONS | $100,000 |
| FMDG MUSIC SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| VIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT | $65,000 |
| ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THEBLIND | $64,000 |
| BENETECH | $50,000 |
| NORTHSIDE CENTER | $50,000 |
| FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $50,000 |
| OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK | $50,000 |
| THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING | $45,000 |
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $40,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE GUILD INTERNATIONAL INC | $40,000 |
| EVERSIGHT | $40,000 |
| GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND | $30,000 |
| CANCER CARE INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND6× · 2020–2025 · $356k · revenue +90%
- NYNEW YORK FOUNDLING6× · 2020–2025 · $245k · revenue +52%
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- VVISIONSone grant, 2024 · $100k
- FFFUND FOR THE BLIND OF VISIONSone grant, 2023 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To improve the quality of life and provide inspiration and opportunity for people who are blind and visually impaired through employment, outreach, rehabilitation, education and research.
To provide exceptional services that inspire people who are visually impaired to attain their goals.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).
To provide patient care at the highest quality, most technologically advanced and consistent multidisciplinary care in an environment where the safety, dignity and comfort of each patient are paramount. in delivering patient care, new york…
To improve the quality of life and provide inspiration and opportunity for people who are blind and visually impaired through employment, outreach, rehabilitation, education, and research.to improve the quality of life and provide…
Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.
Provide innovative training and tools for people who are blind or visually impaired to help them achieve their goals and dreams
In-sight inspires confidence and builds skills that help people who are visually impaired and blind to thrive and succeed.
To provide employment and education for the adult legally blind and help them to live independently.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Guild International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds SUNY COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds KINGS BAY YM-YWHA INC ↗
- Who funds VIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds Eversight ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds Freedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRINTING HOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds HELP ME SEE INC ↗
- Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FILOMEN M DAGOSTINO GREENBERG MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE GUILD INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ENVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds ENRICHMENT AUDIO RESOURCE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds HASC DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lavelle Fund for the Blind Inc · Reader's Digest Partners for Sight Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Sarah Decoizart Perpetual Charitable Tr · Robin Hood Foundation · William G and Helen C Hoffman Fdn · Consumer Technology Association Foundation · The Gibney Family Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · United Way Worldwide · Jewish Communal Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allene Reuss Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allene Reuss Memorial Trust?
Find your warmest path to Allene Reuss Memorial Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.