Skip to content
Allen Temple Development Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Allen Temple Development Inc

Allen temple development provides households earning less than 60% of the area median income qualify for units with reduced rent.

$409k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $271k
$25,546
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEN TEMPLE AME CHURCH ATLANTA$153,269
MORRIS BROWN COLLEGE$66,418
ZION HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR$51,090
SPELMAN COLLEGE FOR GRANDERSON DANS$25,546
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ATL$25,546
FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$25,546
UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA$25,545
SIGMA ZETA FOUNDATION INC$25,545
CARRIE-STEELE PITTS HOME$10,208
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARRIE-STEELE PITTS HOME: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
4
University System of Georgia Foundation Inc & Affiliates

The mission of the University System of Georgia Foundation, a cooperative organization of the Board of Regents, is to support and advance the work of the University System of Georgia consistent with the University System's Strategic Plan.

Education
5
Clark Atlanta University Inc

Clark atlanta university is a research institution with activity characterized by a focus on the intellectual and personal development of each student. its purpose is to prepare a community of learners who excel in their chosen endeavors…

Education
6
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
7
Morehouse College

Morehouse college is a historically black college whose mission is to develop men with disciplined minds who will lead lives of leadership and service.

Education
8
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
9
Trinity College

To expand on the mission statement made on page 1, trinity's core mission values and characteristics emphasize: 1)commitment to the education of women in a particular way through the design and pedagogy of the historic undergraduate…

Education
10
Uga Real Estate Foundation Inc

The UGA Real Estate Foundation manages and improves various real estate assets for the benefit of the University of Georgia, governed by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. The UGA Real Estate Foundation may also…

Philanthropy
11
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
12
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of West Georgia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sigma Zeta Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLEN TEMPLE AME CHURCH: $153,269 · OtherALLEN TEMPLE AME CHURCHFORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA INC: $25,546 · OtherFORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA INCMORRIS BROWN COLLEGE: $66,418 · EducationMORRIS BROWN COLLEGESpelman College: $25,546 · EducationSpelman CollegeUniversity of West Georgia Foundation Inc: $25,545 · EducationUniversity of West Georgia Found…Zion Hill Community Development Corporation: $51,090 · Housing & ShelterZion Hill Comm…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $25,546 · PhilanthropySIGMA ZETA FOUNDATION INC: $25,545 · HealthCARRIE STEELE-PITTS HOME INC: $10,208 · Human Services
Other$178,815Education$117,509Housing & Shelter$51,090Philanthropy$25,546Health$25,545Human Services$10,208

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORRIS BROWN COLLEGE: $66,418 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetZion Hill Community Development Corporation: $51,090 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetSpelman College: $25,546 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $25,546 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA INC: $25,546 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of West Georgia Foundation Inc: $25,545 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIGMA ZETA FOUNDATION INC: $25,545 over 1y, 31% of budgetCARRIE STEELE-PITTS HOME INC: $10,208 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundat…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Georgia Power Foundation IncGA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen Temple Development Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen Temple Development Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allen Temple Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home