Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$64kEnvironment$57kCivil Rights$40kEducation$31kHealth$15kReligion$8kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PREP FOR PREP$5,000
CARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRIENDS OF GEORGICIA POND FDN: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 3 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
31

Total granted

$48k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PREP FOR PREP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue -22%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue -15%
  • PL
    PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TM
    THE METROPOLITAN OPERA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
2
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
3
The North Shore Land Alliance Inc

To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.

Environment
4
Battery Park City Parks Conservancy Corporation

The battery park city parks conservancy's mission is to manage, maintain, operate, repair, preserve and program activities to a world class standard for the residential parks, open space, and other public structures located on the 92 acre…

Recreation & Sports
5
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
6
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
7
Bartow Pell Landmark Fund

Preservation, restoration and interpretation of the nyc and national historic landmark site for the benefit of the public.

Arts & Culture
8
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
9
Preserve Larchmont Inc

Historical preservation in Larchmont NY

Arts & Culture
10
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

—
11
Queens-Long Island Renal Institute

To assure dialysis patients of the finest quality of care, state-of-the-art technology and uncompromised dignity, in a comfortable setting.

Health
12
The Partnership for New York City Inc

(a) the development, stimulation, encouragement, improvement and promotion of the business climate in new york city; (b) the fostering of trade and commerce in new york city and the promotion of the general welfare andprosperity of new…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Penta Medical Recycling Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $25,000 · OtherBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVALFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INCTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $15,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERACENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $10,000 · OtherCHILD MIND INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $10,000 · OtherST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $7,500 · OtherPECONIC LAND TRUST: $6,500 · Other+20 more: $64,000 · Other+20 morePREP FOR PREP: $20,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentPENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP: $7,500 · InternationalTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$193,000Education$20,000Civil Rights$15,000Environment$12,500International$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPREP FOR PREP: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARCHE LONG ISLAND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LARCHE LONG ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph