Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of ALG FAMILY FOUNDATION PEYSER & ALEXANDER MGT INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PREP FOR PREP$5,000
CARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRIENDS OF GEORGICIA POND FDN: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48k · 3 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
31

Total granted

$48k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsEnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PREP FOR PREP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue -22%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue -15%
  • PL
    PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BC
    BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TM
    THE METROPOLITAN OPERA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
2
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
3
The North Shore Land Alliance Inc

To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.

Environment
4
Battery Park City Parks Conservancy Corporation

The battery park city parks conservancy's mission is to manage, maintain, operate, repair, preserve and program activities to a world class standard for the residential parks, open space, and other public structures located on the 92 acre…

Recreation & Sports
5
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
6
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
7
Bartow Pell Landmark Fund

Preservation, restoration and interpretation of the nyc and national historic landmark site for the benefit of the public.

Arts & Culture
8
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
9
Preserve Larchmont Inc

Historical preservation in Larchmont NY

Arts & Culture
10
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

11
Queens-Long Island Renal Institute

To assure dialysis patients of the finest quality of care, state-of-the-art technology and uncompromised dignity, in a comfortable setting.

Health
12
The Partnership for New York City Inc

(a) the development, stimulation, encouragement, improvement and promotion of the business climate in new york city; (b) the fostering of trade and commerce in new york city and the promotion of the general welfare andprosperity of new…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Penta Medical Recycling Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INCBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL — $25,000 · OtherBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVALTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $15,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERASOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherCHILD MIND INSTITUTE — $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS — $10,000 · OtherST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $7,500 · OtherPECONIC LAND TRUST — $6,500 · Other+21 more — $69,000 · Other+21 morePREP FOR PREP — $20,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsPECONIC LAND TRUST INC — $12,500 · EnvironmentPENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP — $7,500 · InternationalCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$188,000Education$20,000Civil Rights$15,000Environment$12,500International$7,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPREP FOR PREP — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLARCHE LONG ISLAND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PREP FOR PREP
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LARCHE LONG ISLAND INC
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HILL NEIGHBORS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alg Family Foundation Peyser & Alexander Mgt Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph