Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino Charitable Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$37kAnimals$36kEducation$25kEnvironment$13kCrime & Legal$8kReligion$7kPhilanthropy$3kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k9 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$214k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSPCA - NEVINS$25,000
WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC$17,500
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$5,000
ST MICHAELS PARISH$3,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
BACKYARD GROWERS$1,000
WELLSPRING HOUSE$500
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$400
TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$100
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $100 → 16%WELLSPRING HOUSE: $1k → 10%WELLSPRING HOUSE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 5 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$79k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
-19%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MN
    MSPCA - NEVINS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k
  • WF
    WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k
  • SM
    ST MICHAELS PARISH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k

Funded once

  • UL
    UMASS LOWELL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -19%
  • DT
    DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
3
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
6
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Emerson Health System Inc

Emerson health systems is the parent organization of four subsidiaries - emerson hospital, emerson occupational health services, emerson property development and emerson health care foundation. emerson health systems provides its…

Health
9
Buckley Country Day School

The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…

Education
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
The Boston Children's School Inc

To promote the growth and development of children while teaching them how to learn efficiently and experience the joy of learning

Education
12
Boston Children's Network Specialty Physicians Inc

BCNSP supports the following three pillars of Boston Children's Hospital's four-part mission: (1) providing care to individuals in the community, (2) improving clinical care to its patients, and (3) educating and training clinicians. In…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home for Little Wanderers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Essex County Greenbelt Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSPCA - NEVINS: $35,000 · OtherMSPCA - NEVINSWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC: $35,000 · OtherWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTICUMASS LOWELL: $25,000 · OtherUMASS LOWELLST MICHAELS PARISH: $7,000 · OtherST MICHAELS PARISH+8 more: $6,673 · Other+8 moreESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · EnvironmentESSEX COUN…SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSTOMP OUT BULLYING CORP: $2,500 · Crime & LegalWELLSPRING HOUSE INC: $1,600 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $100 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 · HealthBACKYARD GROWERS INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$108,673Environment$12,500Crime & Legal$7,500Human Services$1,700Health$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOMP OUT BULLYING CORP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWELLSPRING HOUSE INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKYARD GROWERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STOMP OUT BULLYING CORP ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BACKYARD GROWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Wellspring House Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Essex County Greenbelt Association: 8% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alfred F and Jeanne Am Contarino’s filings →

More from the funding graph