How much did ALFRED AND KATHLEEN MURABITO grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of ALFRED AND KATHLEEN MURABITO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

church

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $15k
$10k–50k5 grants · $75k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST FRANCIS HOME OF THE FRANCISCAN$20,000
DFW TRAINING CENTER$20,000
CORNERSTONE ATX CHURCH$15,000
BAY AREA DRAGONS WRESTLING CENTER$10,000
OUR LADY OF PEACE RETREAT HOUSE$10,000
LIONS WRESTLING$5,000
LAKE TRAVIS WRESTLING$3,000
FRIENDS OF WRESTLING PREP$2,500
FOSTER VILLAGE INC$2,500
LOS GATOS WRESTLING$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$543k · 8 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$543k

$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%

+26%

Still filing today

38%

29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEmploymentHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BA
BAY AREA DRAGONS WRESTLING CENTER
3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +82%
TS
THE SAN FRANCISCO WRESTLING CLUB
2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +170% · 44% of their budget
MD
MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION
2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

SC
ST CLARE'S RETREAT CENTER
one grant, 2018 · $180k
WI
WRESTLERS IN BUSINESS NETWORK
one grant, 2023 · $35k
BW
BEARS WRESTLING CLUB
one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sunnyvale Wrestling Club

We are a sport for good non-profit primarily using the sport of wrestling to develop youth

Recreation & Sports

Mandan Wrestling Club

To give every wrestler the opportunity to learn, to achieve, and to go as far as their determination, talents, and abilities will allow them. the club is dedicated to the amateur sport of wrestling at all levels.

Recreation & Sports

Metropolitan Wrestling Association

develop America's youth for Olympic Style wrestling

—

Casper Wrestling Club

Casper wrestling club is a youth sports club for beginners, amateurs & elite wrestlers of all ages.

Recreation & Sports

Mat Rats Wrestling Club

Mat Rats Wrestling Club is organized for the prupose of providing quality oppotunities for youth to excel in the sport of wrestling, including, but not limited to practices, tournaments and camps.

Recreation & Sports

Velva Bulls

Youth wrestling club with the goal to give every athlete the tools they need to become a better wrestler, student and citizen.

Youth Development

Brighton Wrestling Club Inc

The mission is to help our youth achieve their goals in the sport of wrestling while building them into quality wrestlers whom exhibit exceptional community pride, discipline, and excellence in the sport.

Recreation & Sports

Dcac Inc

The dcac fosters and promotes the sport of amateur wrestling at all age levels in the domestic & international styles of wrestling through clinics one day teaching seminars camps multiple date teaching and competition gatherings and…

Recreation & Sports

Junior Cougars Wrestling Club of Sacramento

The wrestling program teach youths from 3rd to 8th Grade folk style wrestling. The season runs from November to February.

Recreation & Sports

Montgomery Youth Wrestling

Teaching youth the sport of wrestling in an encouraging and competitive environment, arranging, organizing and hosting competitive youth wrestling matches, tournaments and clinics while encouraging youth to participate in such wrestling…

Recreation & Sports

Nashville Catholic Youth Wrestling

Nashville catholic youth wrestlings mission is to teach and promote amateur wrestling as a sport based on skill, determination, hard work and self-displine.

Youth Development

Westwood Heights Freestyle Wrestling Club

to teach the sport of freestyle and folkstyle wrestling. we provide transportation to and from tournaments,uniforms,shoes and food during the tournaments.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Wrestling Club and the most unlike its peers is Bikes Because We Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/9

Grantees still filing

7/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$853,521Recreation & Sports$25,000Arts & Culture$8,000Human Services$5,000Employment$2,500Health$1,500Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALFRED AND KATHLEEN MURABITO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE SAN FRANCISCO WRESTLING CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 823281382 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE SAN FRANCISCO WRESTLING CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alfred and Kathleen Murabito?

Find your warmest path to Alfred and Kathleen Murabito through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALFRED AND KATHLEEN MURABITO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alfred and Kathleen Murabito?

More from the funding graph

ALFRED AND KATHLEEN MURABITO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alfred and Kathleen Murabito?

More from the funding graph