Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alexis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$89kEducation$20kHuman Services$14kYouth Development$10kAnimals$5kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$2kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THERAYOUTH FOUNDATION$15,000
SOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL$10,000
PG CHAMBERS SCHOOL$10,000
OUR HOUSE INC$10,000
HELP HOPE LIVE$10,000
DERON SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
ECLC FOUNDATION$5,000
CREATURE COMFORT PET THERAPY$5,000
WE'VE GOT FRIENDS$5,000
THE ROSE HOUSE$5,000
GRACE$5,000
CTC ACADEMY - CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER$5,000
JESPY HOUSE$5,000
EASTER SEALS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION - ADA: $2k → 17%ACT NOW FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%JESPY HOUSE: $5k → 16%WE'VE GOT FRIENDS: $5k → 16%WE'VE GOT FRIENDS: $5k → 16%THE ROSE HOUSE: $5k → 4%THE CONNECTION FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 5 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$71k
$4k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    SOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • SD
    SHANNON DALEY MEM FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • TC
    THE CONNECTION - SPECIAL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Childrens Center for Neurodevelopmental Studies Inc

To assist the development of autistic and other neurodevelopmentally delayed children toward a happy and productive future where their maximum potential can be realized.

—
2
The Manhattan Childrens Center

Provides transdisciplinary behavioral intervention and education to children and young adults, ages six to twenty-one, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities.

Education
3
Children's Therapy Center of the Quad Cities Nfp

Based upon medical prescription, the organization provides speech therapy, physical therapy occupational therapy and feeding therapy. the organization provides therapy serices to children with developmental disabilities and developmental…

—
4
Services for Children With Hidden Intelligence

Services for children with hidden intelligence, inc. (a new jersey nonprofit corporation), (the "school"), is an approved new jersey state department of education private school for students with disabilities. the school is approved to…

Education
5
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
6
Schi Disability Services Inc

Schi disability services (sds) is dedicated to providing a variety of needed services to individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities and their families in a way that preserves their dignity and integrity, while improving their…

Human Services
7
Children's Developmental Center

The organization empowers familities and improves children's lives through comprehensive early intervention services, education, and therapeutic services. the organization primarily offers services to children from birth to three years…

Education
8
Advocates for Children of New Jersey

To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.

Human Services
9
Child Development Center Inc

The Child Development Center is a developmental day center designed to build the independence of exceptional children through high-quality early education and therapeutic services. It serves special needs children ages 2 to 5 from New…

Education
10
Accord Child Care Services Inc

To provide family and child-centered applied behavior analysis (aba) therapy for children with autism and other related disorders. we work with families to provide aba therapy in the home, community, at our support center, and (in special…

—
11
Alexander Leigh Center for Autism

To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…

Education
12
The Summit Center Inc

The summit center, inc. is a private, not-for-profit organization approved by new york state to provide educational, therapeutic, and support services to children and young adults with autism, speech delays and disorders, and other…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ctc Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creature Comfort Pet Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOLOUR HOUSE INC: $15,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCTHERAYOUTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherTHERAYOUTH FOUNDATIONPG CHAMBERS SCHOOL: $13,000 · OtherPG CHAMBERS SCHOOL+3 more: $6,000 · Other+3 moreSOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $13,000 · HealthSOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENT…HELPHOPELIVE INC: $10,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INCTHE CTC ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE CTC ACADEMY INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEA…EASTER SEALS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS FOUNDATIONWEVE GOT FRIENDS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWEVE GOT FRIENDS IN…JESPY HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJESPY HOUSE INCTHE ROSE HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROSE HOUSEADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesADAPTIVE DESIGN ASS…ACT NOW FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesACT NOW FOUNDATION …THE CONNECTION FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTION FOR …Creature Comfort Pet Therapy: $5,000 · AnimalsECLC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGRACE - GIVING AND RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FOR OUR COMMUNITY'S ESSENTIALS INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionDERON SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · International
Other$69,000Health$32,000Human Services$26,000Animals$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Education$5,000International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHERAYOUTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPG CHAMBERS SCHOOL: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEVE GOT FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECLC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE - GIVING AND RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FOR OUR COMMUNITY'S ESSENTIALS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJESPY HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDERON SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetTHE CTC ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSE HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Summit Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alexis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alexis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Jespy House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Act Now Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Our House Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Creature Comfort Pet Therapy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alexis’ filings →

More from the funding graph