Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alexander Charities Inc

TO PROVIDE A FOCUS ON HOUSING, SHELTER, AND REALTED NEEDS IN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$285kArts & Culture$20kHuman Services$11kHealth$10kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$944k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Senior Living Alternative Inc$43,192
Reach of Washington County (MD)$18,000
Habitat for Humanity$10,000
Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc$5,000
St Johns Shelter for homeless families Inc$4,800
Womens Club Foundation Inc$4,381
TruNorth Company$3,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TruNorth Company: $2k → 12%TruNorth Company: $1k → 12%Wash Cty Comm Action Council: $5k → 12%Wash Cty Comm Action Council: $4k → 12%TruNorth Company: $4k → 12%TruNorth Company: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 11 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$317k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+90%

Still filing today

73%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    Senior Living Alternatives Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +27%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +90%
  • TC
    TruNorth Company
    4× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TI
    The Interfaith Service Coalitian
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • RE
    RELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hopeworks of Howard County Inc

Hopeworks mission is to provide support and advocacy for people in howard county affected by sexual and intimate partner violence and engage the community in creating the change required for prevention.

Human Services
2
The Washington Home Inc
Health
3
Housing Help Plus

Housing help plus is a community development organization that specializes in affordable housing development and management with a secondary focus on urban agriculture projects that benefit the community.

Housing & Shelter
4
Washington Homeownership Resource Center

The mission of washington homeownership resource center is to increase and preserve homeownership in washington state. we provide homebuyers and homeowners with information and referrals to vetted resources. our referrals include homebuyer…

Housing & Shelter
5
Welcome House of South County Inc

Welcome house of south county's mission is to provide emergency shelter, transitional & supported permanent housing to the homeless of washington county. we are committed to the well-being of our clients as we seek to provide affordable &…

—
6
Homefront Development Corporation

It is the mission of homefront development corporation to assist low to moderate income homeowners through housing rehabilitation, emergency home repair programs, and management of affordable senior rental housing in washington and warren…

—
7
Domestic Violence Resource Center of South County Inc

The organization's primary exempt mission is to work toward a future free of violence, and to build a community in which each individual shares the responsibility to create a culture of safety and personal dignity. the dvrc works…

Human Services
8
Community Housing Fund

The community housing fund secures new sources of capital and makes those funds available in the form of flexible loans to community partners who create and preserve equitable and affordable homes and related community facilities in…

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity in Whatcom County

Habitat for humanity in whatcom county is a nondenominational christian non-profit organization whose purpose is to create affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience for people everywhere.

—
10
Washington County Leadership Development Program Inc

Provide leadership development programs to enhance economic development and the quality of life in washington county, maryland.

Education
11
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
12
Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund

The Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund elects candidates, educates voters and decision-makers, and amplifies the voices and priorities of people and communities most impacted by housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington County Community Action Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is TruNorth Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Reach of Washington County (MD): $71,000 · OtherReach of Washington County (MD)HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $31,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INCSt Johns Shelter for Homeless Families Inc: $20,179 · OtherSt Johns Shelter for Homeless Families IncHabitat for Humanity: $10,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityCasa Inc: $5,634 · Other+6 more: $12,086 · Other+6 moreSenior Living Alternatives Inc: $111,835 · Housing & ShelterSenior Living Alternatives IncHagerstown Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc: $26,000 · Housing & ShelterHagerstown Neighborhood Development Partnershi…WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $20,150 · Arts & CultureTruNorth Company: $9,709 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN OF VALOR MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 · Religion
Other$150,399Housing & Shelter$137,835Arts & Culture$20,150Human Services$18,709Religion$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSenior Living Alternatives Inc: $111,835 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $31,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHagerstown Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc: $26,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $20,150 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetTruNorth Company: $9,709 over 4y, 20% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN OF VALOR MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCASA - CITIZENS ASSISTING AND SHELTERING THE ABUSED INC: $3,367 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH): $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Senior Living Alternatives Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hagerstown Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TruNorth Company ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF VALOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA - CITIZENS ASSISTING AND SHELTERING THE ABUSED INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland IncMD17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alexander Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alexander Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Casa - Citizens Assisting and Sheltering the Abused Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Washington County Community Action Council Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alexander Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alexander Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alexander Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph