Skip to content

· Public charity

Alaska State Hockey Association Inc

Youth & adult hockey leagues, tournaments & camps promote youth hockey, develop and encourage sportmanship between all players for the betterment of the individuals physical & social well being.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$62k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $16,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $56,637 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,637 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
South Anchorage Hockey Association$6,000
Scotty Gomez Foundation Hockey$5,000
Anchorage Hockey Association$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOCKEY CLUB FAIRBANKS: $10k → 8%SOUTH ANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOC: $8k → 10%South Anchorage Hockey Association: $6k → 10%UA FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska State Hockey Association Inc

To provide youth and adult hockey leagues, tournaments, and camps to promote youth hockey, to develop and encourage sportsmanship between all players for the betterment of the individuals physical and social well being.

Unclassified
2
Medway Amateur Hockey Association
Education
3
Nighthawks Youth Hockey Club

Youth hockey development

Recreation & Sports
4
Aberdeen Amateur Hockey Association

Youth skating and hockey

Recreation & Sports
5
Northern Berkshire Youth Hockey League Inc
—
6
North Hills Amateur Hockey Association

Empowering youth through memorable hockey experiences, fostering respect, discipline, and sportsmanship, while nurturing talent and emphasizing hard work and team spirit.

Recreation & Sports
7
Laramie Amateur Hockey Club Inc

To provide laramie youth with a structured winter activity

—
8
Amateur Armstrong Hockey League

Educate youth hockey players in the fundamentals of teamwork, sportsmanship, and skill development.

Recreation & Sports
9
American Collegiate Hockey Association

The american collegiate hockey association is the national governing body for the sport of ice hockey at the collegiate level throughout the united states. the overall objective is to maintain the highest possible standards for the sport…

Recreation & Sports
10
Arizona High School Hockey Assoc Inc

The mission of the Arizona High School Hockey Association is to provide high school students the opportunity to participate in a high quality youth sports program, promoting the life skills inherent to participation in a competitive…

Recreation & Sports
11
Petoskey Area Hockey Association Char-Em Hockey Association

To offer an affordable, local hockey program focused on achievement, fulfillment, enrichment, and enjoyment of its membership.

Recreation & Sports
12
Shoreline Sharks Youth Hockey Inc

Promoting the sport of youth ice hockey

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Allstar Hockey Association; the most unlike its peers is University of Alaska Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH ANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsSOUTH ANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONScotty Gomez Foundation: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsScotty Gomez FoundationHOCKEY CLUB FAIRBANKS INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHOCKEY CLUB FAIRBANKS INCFriends of Hockey Club Fairbanks: $5,583 · Recreation & SportsFriends of Hockey Club FairbanksANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,427 · Recreation & SportsANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INCALASKA ALLSTAR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsALASKA ALLSTAR HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ALAS…
Recreation & Sports$51,510Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH ANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetScotty Gomez Foundation: $12,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKEY CLUB FAIRBANKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFriends of Hockey Club Fairbanks: $5,583 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,427 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALASKA ALLSTAR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alaska State Hockey Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alaska State Hockey Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alaska State Hockey Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph