Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alan and Donna Schuler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$48kYouth Development$42kFood & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$18kHuman Services$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kMembership Benefit$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$213k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wesley House Student Residence$10,000
Just in Time for Foster Youth$9,000
Just in Time for Foster Youth$8,000
LJ STEAM Foundation$5,000
Warren County Historical Society$2,000
Sheffield Depot Preservation Society$2,000
Warren County Historical Society$2,000
Barnes Cemetary Association$2,000
Sheffield Volunteer Fire Dept & Ambulance$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%North Star Family Center: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 8 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$143k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+45%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH
    4× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +28%
  • WC
    WARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • SD
    San Diego Lifesaving Association
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SD
    San Diego LGBT Community Center
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • AS
    Associated Students SDSUARH San Diego Food Bank
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • SD
    San Diego Food BankSDSU ARH
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Save Oceanside Sand

Save Oceanside Sand is a group of local activists dedicated to restoring and preserving the beaches of Oceanside, California. Working with local, regional, state, and federal authorities, our mission is to protect this vital resource by…

Education
2
San Diego Co Fire Chiefs Association San Diego Fire Chiefs Training Officers

Enhance capabilities of Fire Training Officers in San Diego County.

Education
3
San Dieguito Surf Soccer Club

The mission of San Dieguito Surf Soccer is to provide equitable access to high-quality soccer programs that promote athletic development, personal growth, and community engagement. As a nonprofit organization, we are committed to removing…

—
4
San Diego Coasters
Arts & Culture
5
San Diego Double Ten Committee
Arts & Culture
6
Boys & Girls Club of South San Luis Obispo County

To operate a boys and girls club facility and after-school and summer camp programs for all area children regardless of ability to pay in the Five Cities area of San Luis Obispo County.

Youth Development
7
Usa Softball of Southern California Santee
Recreation & Sports
8
Housing Help of San Diego

The specific purpose of Housing Help of San Diego (HHOSD) is to provide supportive services and tailored solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Southwestern Junior Foundation

The goal of the Southwestern Junior Foundation is to extend sailing and angler experiences to the youth of San Diego County who are in need of financial assistance.

Recreation & Sports
10
Sport Innovators

To establish San Diego and Southern California as the core of the healthy living, sports and active lifestyle community. Through supporting companies at all stages, we help create jobs, but not just any jobs, jobs that make our city and…

Philanthropy
11
San Diego County Philatelic Council

To promote stamp collecting

—
12
San Diego Crime Commission

Law enforcement agencies in today's environment find it difficult to cope with the magnitude of crime without the involved support of business, media and community. Since 1981, the San Diego County Crime Commission has built public…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wesley House Student Residence Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Lifesaving Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INC: $20,000 · OtherWESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INCBARNES CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · OtherBARNES CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONSan Diego LGBT Community Center: $11,000 · OtherSan Diego LGBT Community CenterAssociated Students SDSUARH San Diego Food Bank: $10,000 · OtherAssociated Students SDSUARH San Diego Food BankSan Diego Food BankSDSU ARH: $6,190 · OtherSan Diego Food BankSDSU ARHIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAssociated Students SDSUARH Food Bank: $5,000 · OtherAssociated Students SDSUARH Food BankSHEFFIELD DEPOT PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherSHEFFIELD DEPOT PRESERVATION SOCIETYUNDOCUMENTED RESOURCE CENTER: $4,500 · Other+5 more: $6,500 · Other+5 moreCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $47,500 · HealthCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUT…JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $41,500 · Youth DevelopmentJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER…San Diego Lifesaving Association: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSHEFFIELD TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · Arts & CultureNorth Star Family Center: $5,000 · Human ServicesLJ STEAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Science & TechCARLSBAD SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsChristmas Circle Community Park: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$85,190Health$47,500Youth Development$41,500Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Arts & Culture$8,000Human Services$5,000Science & Tech$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $47,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $41,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNorth Star Family Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHEFFIELD TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCARLSBAD SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBorrego Springs Youth and Senior Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetChristmas Circle Community Park: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds North Star Family Center ↗
  • Who funds LJ STEAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Lifesaving Association ↗
  • Who funds SHEFFIELD TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CARLSBAD SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Borrego Springs Youth and Senior Center ↗
  • Who funds Christmas Circle Community Park ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan and Donna Schuler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan and Donna Schuler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alan and Donna Schuler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph