Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

$7k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Environment$42kRecreation & Sports$500
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $6,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,265 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,165 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$376k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Village Creek Society$6,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Coosa Riverkeeper: $4k → 7%Stream Beam: $500 → 11%Wetland Environmental Learning Projects Inc: $1k → 13%Black Warrior Riverkeeper Inc: $4k → 16%Friends of Hurricane Creek: $4k → 17%Litter River Waterkeeper: $3k → 19%Mobile Baykeeper: $4k → 19%Black Warrior Riverkeeper: $250 → 16%Friends of Hurricane Creek: $1k → 17%The Village Creek Society: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mobile Baykeeper — $8,000 · OtherMobile BaykeeperThe Village Creek Society — $6,100 · OtherThe Village Creek SocietyFRIENDS OF HURRICANE CREEK INC — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HURRICANE CREEK INCIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBlack Warrior Riverkeeper Inc — $2,500 · OtherBlack Warrior Riverkeeper IncCoosa Riverkeeper — $2,500 · OtherCoosa RiverkeeperWetland Environmental Learning Projects Inc — $1,000 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherBLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,250 · EnvironmentBLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INCCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,000 · EnvironmentCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INCMobile Baykeeper Inc — $4,000 · EnvironmentMobile Baykeeper IncENERGY ALABAMA — $1,000 · EnvironmentENERGY ALABAMATENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER — $1,000 · EnvironmentTENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER
Other$28,600Environment$14,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetENERGY ALABAMA — $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds COOSA RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds Mobile Baykeeper Inc
  • Who funds ENERGY ALABAMA
  • Who funds TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abahac IncTN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abahac Inc · Patagoniaorg · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph