Skip to content
Aishel Avraham Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Aishel Avraham Inc

Distributing income derived to exempt organizations for the benefit of the elderly, disabled and infirm and to lawfully do any and all things necessary, suitable and proper for the accomplishment of these purposes.

$661k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$481k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$6.1MHealth$700kEducation$525kPublic Safety & Disaster$500kHuman Services$255kPublic Benefit$40kInternational$35k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $481k
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION ADAS YERIMAN$481,000
BNOS CHANA VIEN$90,000
YESHIVA OITZER HATORAH$90,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAMASPIK OF KINGS COUNTY: $200k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 4 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$4.8M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+84%

Still filing today

25%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.1M
  • SE
    SENIOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $580k · 100% of their budget
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF NEW YORK VFW AUXILIARY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k

Funded once

  • CA
    CONGREGATION ADAS VIEN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M
  • BP
    BOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -32%
  • CC
    CONGREGATION CHASAM SOFER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tzevet Hatzolah Emergency Response

Ensure that every segment of israeli society is protected from terrorism and is well equipped to respond to life threatening emergencies

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
3
Jewish Caring Network Gevuras Yarden Inc

assistance with serious illness

Health
4
Kolel Zichron Avrohom Inc

Supervision of kosher meal preparation

Religion
5
Hahaim Yeshivat Shalom Inc
Education
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
8
Hatzoloh Incorporated Dba Chevra Hatzalah

Chevra Hatzalah, a non-profit corporation, is the largest all-volunteer Ambulance Service in the United States, providing premium quality pre-hospital emergency medical treatment and transportation at no cost to all who need it, regardless…

Health
9
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
10
Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Humanitarian Partnership for Israel

Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM: $4,123,051 · OtherCONGREGATION ADAS YEREIMCONGREGATION ADAS VIEN INC: $1,075,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ADAS VIEN INCCONGREGATION CHASAM SOFER INC: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION CHASAM SOFER INC+6 more: $291,112 · OtherBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $500,000 · HealthBOROUGH P…GUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $200,000 · HealthGUARDIANS…SENIOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM INC: $580,000 · EducationROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyHAMASPIK OF KINGS COUNTY INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $50,000 · InternationalKEREN HATZADIK IN MEMORY OF RABBI ARYEH LEVIN OF BLESSED MEMORY INC: $35,000 · InternationalYESHIVA MAMAR MORDECHAI NADVORNA: $70,000 · Religion
Other$5,989,163Health$700,000Education$580,000Philanthropy$500,000Human Services$200,000International$85,000Religion$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM INC: $580,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $500,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAMASPIK OF KINGS COUNTY INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA MAMAR MORDECHAI NADVORNA: $70,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKEREN HATZADIK IN MEMORY OF RABBI ARYEH LEVIN OF BLESSED MEMORY INC: $35,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $10,012 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundAlyad Foundation IncJewish Communal FundFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ojc FundNY24.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aishel Avraham Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aishel Avraham Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aishel Avraham Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Aishel Avraham Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aishel Avraham’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home