Skip to content
Aish Tamid Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Aish Tamid Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$928k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$272k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$2.2MReligion$1.4MFood & Nutrition$132kHuman Services$81kInternational$35kHealth$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $179k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $459k
  • $250k+1 grant · $272k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BMG$271,700
MESIVTA OF CLIFTON$175,000
TOUCH OF KINDNESS$80,000
YESHIVA WOLOZIN BNEI BRAK$79,000
TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
AGUDAS TOV VCHESED$35,000
OHR SHMUEL$25,000
BAIS MEDRASH OHR HATORAH$25,000
MISHKAN HATORAH$23,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HEICHAL HATORAH$18,000
ADAS YISROEL$13,250
GEM$10,000
YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OHR SHMUEL: $25k → 11%BONEI OLAM: $18k → 20%HELPING OUT PEOPLE EVERYDAY CORP: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
33

Total granted

$2.5M
$1000k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+3%

Still filing today

30%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $300k · revenue +10%
  • TR
    TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $196k · revenue +20%
  • TO
    TOUCH OF KINDNESS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $127k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $143k
  • KO
    KOLLEL OHR HATORAH
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
5
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
8
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
9
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
10
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
11
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
12
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Wolozin Bnei Brak Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ahavas Torah V'chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,007,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBMG: $271,700 · OtherBMGIndividual grant recipient: $142,500 · Other+38 more: $853,250 · Other+38 moreMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $300,000 · EducationMESIVTA OF CLIFT…TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $196,273 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARC…HEICHAL HATORAH: $79,000 · EducationHEICHAL HATORAHYESHIVA WOLOZIN BNEI BRAK ISRAEL INC: $251,000 · ReligionYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $20,000 · ReligionBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $15,000 · Religion+2 more: $15,000 · ReligionTOUCH OF KINDNESS INC: $126,800 · Food & NutritionAHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $30,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyOHR SHMUEL INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesHELPING OUT PEOPLE EVERDAY CORP: $5,000 · Human ServicesAGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC: $35,000 · InternationalYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $5,000 · InternationalOUR PLACE INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,774,450Education$575,273Religion$301,000Food & Nutrition$126,800Philanthropy$55,000Human Services$48,000International$40,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $300,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetYESHIVA WOLOZIN BNEI BRAK ISRAEL INC: $251,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $196,273 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTOUCH OF KINDNESS INC: $126,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $79,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTORAH UGDULA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYad L Talmid: $7,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHELPING OUT PEOPLE EVERDAY CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 31% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA WOLOZIN BNEI BRAK ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH OF KINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEICHAL HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds AGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR SHMUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Community Foun…Jewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Sff FoundationAar Charitable Founda…Eisenberg Family Foun…Zichron Btz Tzedakah …The Zev and Susan Mun…The Jmg FoundationThe Ganger Foundation…The Weiskopf Family F…
The Ojc FundNY35.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Sff Foundation · Aar Charitable Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Ganger Foundation Inc · The Weiskopf Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aish Tamid Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aish Tamid Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aish Tamid Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Aish Tamid Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aish Tamid’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home