Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aid Association for the Blind of the District of Columbia C/O

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.5MFood & Nutrition$376kHuman Services$267kPhilanthropy$255kEducation$80kHousing & Shelter$30kReligion$17kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION$51,000
WASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER$40,000
INDEPENDENCE NOW$34,050
PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METRO WASHINGTON$32,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY INC$30,000
WASHINGTON LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS & URBAN AFFAIRS$22,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC$20,000
IONA SENIOR SERVICES$10,000
LISNER LOUISE DICKSON HURT HOME$5,000
OMNIUM CIRCUSENSE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $15k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $15k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $13k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $11k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $11k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $40k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $36k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $30k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $30k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 21 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$3.4M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+95%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WN
    WASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $524k · revenue +48%
  • DC
    DC CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
    5× · 2017–2024 · $232k · revenue +20%
  • IN
    Independence Now Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue +95%
  • TG
    The George Washington Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • BJ
    BENDER JEWISH COMMUNINITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
2
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
3
Disability Law Center of Virginia

Dlcv's mission is to advance independence, choice and self-determination; protect legal, human, and civil rights; and eliminate abuse, neglect and discrimination of people with disabilities through zealous and uncompromising legal advocacy…

Human Services
4
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
5
United States International Council On Disabilities

To advance international disability rights and inclusive development and to build bridges among the u.s. and foreign governments, disability and human rights communities, and the private sector through strategic advocacy, convening, and…

Human Services
6
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
7
The Arc of the District of Columbia Inc

To improve the quality of life for all persons with intellectual disabilities and their families through supports and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Direct Center for Independence Inc

Mission Advocated disability voice, choice, and independenceVision Universal access and justice

Human Services
9
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
10
Federal City Council

The mission of the federal city council is to focus the creativity, talent and resources of washington dc's business and civic leaders on washington, dc's biggest challenges and opportunities.

—
11
Disability Empowerment Center

Disability empowerment center helps community members find and access the resources they need to lead successful and independent lives.

Human Services
12
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Association of People With Disabilities; the most unlike its peers is Omnium Universe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER INC: $524,260 · OtherWASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER INCCHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $500,460 · OtherCHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATIONPREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METRO WASHINGTON: $350,550 · OtherPREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METRO WASHINGTONDC CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $232,000 · OtherDC CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGSOME INC: $198,913 · OtherSOME INC+14 more: $398,480 · Other+14 moreAMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC: $264,365 · HealthAMERICAN CO…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $255,455 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $154,000 · Human ServicesIona Senior Services: $95,455 · Human ServicesIndependence Now Inc: $200,080 · Civil RightsBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $176,910 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $138,410 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,204,663Health$354,365Philanthropy$255,455Human Services$249,455Civil Rights$200,080Food & Nutrition$176,910Arts & Culture$138,410

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER INC: $524,260 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC: $264,365 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetWASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $255,455 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetDC CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $232,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetIndependence Now Inc: $200,080 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSOME INC: $198,913 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $176,910 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $154,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $138,410 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetIona Senior Services: $95,455 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $30,440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMNIUM UNIVERSE FOUNDATION INC: $16,970 over 2y, 40% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONAL EYE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds DC CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Independence Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds OMNIUM UNIVERSE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aid Association for the Blind of the District of Columbia C/O funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aid Association for the Blind of the District of Columbia C/O. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Independence Now Inc: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aid Association for the Blind of the District of Columbia C/O’s filings →

More from the funding graph