Skip to content

· Public charity

Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc

The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.

$15M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$582k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$22MInternational$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.2MHealth$639kHuman Services$298kEducation$158kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 40 grants below total $3,732,717, the rows itemized in this filing. The $15,097,291 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,364,574 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $429k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$32,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED RABBIS OF AMERICA$581,671
CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE$360,000
AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED$326,400
CONG ACHDUT$276,560
BINYAN YERUSHLAIM$225,000
CHONEN VNOSEN$204,820
MERCAZ HATORAH VEHACHINCH$189,844
RBM CIRCLE$175,000
MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC$157,050
CONGREGATION KNESST SIMCHA$125,000
MERKAZ TORANI ORAITA INC$102,075
CONGREGATION KEREN SHIVIM$100,000
EZRAS YISROEL$100,000
ANENI WE ANSWER INC$99,420
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC$89,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $300k → 7%CHAIM LECHAG INC: $21k → 9%FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $115k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $760k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $29k → 11%YAD CHAYA INC: $107k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $409k → 20%YAD CHAYA INC: $38k → 14%YAD CHAYA INC: $37k → 14%YESHIVA GEDOLAH KESSER TORAH: $35k → 14%YAD CHAYA INC: $30k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $11M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $9.6M to organizations and $1.3M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$11M · 100% · 43 grants · 14559 people

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE TO INDIGENTS · DONATIONS OF RELIGIOUS ARTICLES TO ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$8k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 40 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
53

Total granted

$22M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+1%

Still filing today

40%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $803k · revenue +2%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $386k · revenue +35% · 25% of their budget
  • YC
    YAD CHAYA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $247k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • KD
    KOLELL D CHASIDEI BELZ
    one grant, 2023 · $2.0M
  • CL
    CONGREGATION LEV SIMCHA
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • GC
    GEMILOS CHASODIM CHASDEI MOSHE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
6
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Ohr Torah

Promoting education by providing financial assistance and support services to educational organizations worldwide; to promote the jewish religion and jewish education through provision of educational programs, assisting the creation of…

Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
9
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
12
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yasis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Idf Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
23/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $2,296,064 · OtherINFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTKOLELL D CHASIDEI BELZ: $2,050,000 · OtherKOLELL D CHASIDEI BELZCONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE: $2,025,500 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHEKOLLEL NACHLAS MOSHE: $1,003,000 · OtherKOLLEL NACHLAS MOSHECONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $1,001,330 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCBINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $640,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KINYAN TORAH: $630,000 · OtherTIFERET: $590,000 · Other+66 more: $7,245,004 · Other+66 moreMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $4,824,959 · ReligionMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT O…GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $803,000 · ReligionGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $385,700 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFER…+8 more: $380,852 · Religion+8 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1,197,540 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $415,000 · Human ServicesYAD CHAYA INC: $247,061 · Human Services+2 more: $29,500 · Human ServicesMERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC: $776,334 · PhilanthropyTHE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $147,400 · PhilanthropyCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC: $100,200 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC: $70,000 · PhilanthropyIDF MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy+7 more: $133,810 · PhilanthropyANENI WE ANSWER INC: $614,420 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $250,000 · EducationMEGED SHOMAYIM: $54,650 · EducationMERCAVA INC: $46,060 · EducationYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $17,238 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationYESHIVA CHASIDEI BELZ BELZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL: $75,000 · InternationalMORASHA OLAMI INC: $52,996 · InternationalSHOSHANAS HOAMOKIM: $35,320 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $10,975 · International
Other$17,480,898Religion$6,394,511Human Services$1,889,101Philanthropy$1,427,744Health$624,420Education$397,948International$174,291

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $4,824,959 over 7y, 25% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1,197,540 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $803,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetMERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC: $776,334 over 4y, 22% of budgetANENI WE ANSWER INC: $614,420 over 3y, 13% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $415,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $385,700 over 3y, 25% of budgetMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $250,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $247,061 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTHE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetYeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $147,400 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLikras Shabbos Inc: $107,452 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC: $100,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVA CHASIDEI BELZ BELZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC: $70,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMEGED SHOMAYIM: $54,650 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMORASHA OLAMI INC: $52,996 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERCAVA INC: $46,060 over 1y, 26% of budgetMIGDAL OZ INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHOSHANAS HOAMOKIM: $35,320 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVENATATI SHALOM INC: $27,625 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetKEREN REFUAH INC: $26,800 over 1y, 11% of budgetYAD AHARON INC: $24,600 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCHAIM LECHAG INC: $21,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends In Need Charitable Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $17,238 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $11,197 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LENEFESH TIDRESHENU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBEIS HACHINUCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYASIS INC: $7,188 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMECHON MAHARAL TZINTZ INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetKUPATH RAMBAHN KOLEL POLIN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANENI WE ANSWER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY ↗
  • Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds Likras Shabbos Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY74.3× affinity78 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Westlawn Foundation · American Friends of Rct Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Beis Hachinuch Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ahavat Yisroel Humanity’s filings →

More from the funding graph