Skip to content

· Public charity

Agc of Georgia Foundation Inc

To improve local communities through charitable giving and to support quality construction education.

$96k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$135kHealth$67kPublic Benefit$58kCommunity Improvement$34kYouth Development$30kEmployment$20kHuman Services$16kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $63,996, the rows itemized in this filing. The $96,299 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,303 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$884k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGC Georgia Inc$34,000
Skills USA Foundation$20,000
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$9,996
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MUST MINISTRIES: $10k → 8%MUST MINISTRIES: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$191k · 5 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$191k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+1153%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Wreaths Across America
    7× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +125%
  • HI
    Hillside Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $57k · revenue +76%
  • MM
    Must Ministries Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $16k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue +36%
  • CT
    CAMP TWIN LAKES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue ×13
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Servants at Work Inc

SAWs is a faith-based nonprofit organization dedicated to providing freedom to people with permanent disabilities in low-income households through the construction of wheelchair ramps.CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O:Our ramps serve as their…

Human Services
2
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
3
Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc

The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.

Employment
4
Camp Horizon Inc

Camp Horizon empowers youth impacted by foster care in Metro Atlanta through new experiences and a caring, consistent community.

—
5
Enable of Georgia Inc

Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.

Housing & Shelter
6
Corporate Volunteer Council of Atlanta

Cvc of atlanta encourages corporate members to develop excellence in corporate volunteerism. develop programs and provide resources.

Community Improvement
7
Goodwill Industries of Tenneva Area Inc

To assist with the disabilities and other barriers to employment in achieving greater independence and self-esteem through comprehensive job training and employment services. The training and services provided are designed to improve their…

—
8
Goodwill Industries of Central Alabama

Goodwill industries provides training and employment for handicapped persons.

Employment
9
Midwest Challenge Inc

Sharing the gospel while providing hope and transformation.

Health
10
Community Havens Inc

As a supporting organization of Community Residences Inc, Community Havens provides residential services and housing facilities to those individuals in Virginia who need assistance and support.

Housing & Shelter
11
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
12
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Assistance Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Associated General Contractors of Georgia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $135,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INCSKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherSKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INCASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF GEORGIA: $34,000 · OtherASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF GEORGIAHillside Inc: $56,930 · HealthHillside IncNO LONGER BOUND INC: $10,020 · HealthNO LONGER BOUND INCWreaths Across America: $57,996 · Public BenefitWreaths Across Ame…Must Ministries Inc: $15,700 · Human ServicesCAMP TWIN LAKES FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Youth Development
Other$219,000Health$66,950Public Benefit$57,996Human Services$15,700Youth Development$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $135,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWreaths Across America: $57,996 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHillside Inc: $56,930 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF GEORGIA: $34,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMust Ministries Inc: $15,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNO LONGER BOUND INC: $10,020 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agc of Georgia Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agc of Georgia Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Agc of Georgia Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Agc of Georgia Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agc of Georgia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph