Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

African American Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin Inc

We champion the growth and sustainability of african american owned businesses by providing access to capital, education and advocacy through capacity building and strategic partnerships.our vision - strong african american owned businesses and entrepreneurs that promote the economic vibrancy of our community by providing limitless…

$540k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF WISCONSIN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $523,896 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $539,603 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,707 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $388k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUFFALO BOSS$50,000
FLY NAILS$20,000
J & SONS TRANSPORT LLC$20,000
DELICIOUS BITES$20,000
NEXT GENERATION DAY CAMP$20,000
OH SNAP BY SHELL PHOTOGRAPHY LLC$19,940
ALLAHMODE$19,651
EBONY ESTHETICS$19,375
VIBEZ CREATIVE ARTS SPACE$18,877
THE CLASSIC SHOPPE$17,746
BASIA ROSE DESIGNS$12,782
WATERSVIEW INVESTMENTS GROUP$10,000
BONIFDE NUTRITION$10,000
GREAT IMPRESSIONS$10,000
MIDWEST ADVANTAGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BONIFDE NUTRITION: $10k → 10%LEAN DESIGN WERKS: $10k → 10%NEXT GENERATION DAY CAMP: $20k → 17%GRIND SEASON: $10k → 10%EMPOWERING WEALTH FINANCIAL COACHING: $9k → 17%FLY NAILS: $20k → 17%OH SNAP BY SHELL PHOTOGRAPHY LLC: $20k → 17%RETRAC ENTERPRISES INC: $10k → 17%LUXURIANT CLEANING GROUP LLC: $10k → 17%UNIEEZ LLC: $10k → 17%MONNIE'S KITCHEN: $7k → 17%ALLAHMODE: $20k → 17%CHAVAH FAMILY: $10k → 17%MOMENTS EXOTIC: $10k → 17%CINNABAR NUTRITION: $10k → 17%MCHETE'S AFRICAN TREASURES LLC: $10k → 17%THE CLASSIC SHOPPE: $18k → 17%MILTED TRUCKING: $10k → 17%LIFE LIKE CAMERA: $10k → 17%AMPAW & ASSOCIATES: $10k → 17%GOOD ENTERTAINMENT LLC: $10k → 17%BUFFALO BOSS: $50k → 17%J & SONS TRANSPORT LLC: $20k → 17%VIBEZ CREATIVE ARTS SPACE: $19k → 17%FUSION INTEGRATED: $10k → 17%GREAT IMPRESSIONS: $10k → 17%EBONY ESTHETICS: $19k → 17%DDS MEDIA WORKS: $10k → 17%SUPER EXPEDITE: $10k → 17%DELICIOUS BITES: $20k → 17%NICHE BOOK BAR: $41k → 17%NICHE BOOK BAR: $30k → 17%COLORFUL CONNECTIONS LLC: $10k → 17%BASIA ROSE DESIGNS: $13k → 17%LITTLE LEADERS LEARNING AND LITERACY ACADEMY LLC: $10k → 17%K&R COMPASSIONATE CARE LLC: $10k → 17%HONEYBEE SAGE & WELLNESS APOTHECARY LLC: $10k → 17%MOCHA BEAUTY: $10k → 17%CULTURALLY DIVERSE COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 17%MIDWEST ADVANTAGE: $10k → 17%WATERSVIEW INVESTMENTS GROUP: $10k → 17%CONNECT BUSINESS CONSULTING: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20212024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $70,898 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUFFALO BOSS NORTH — $50,000 · OtherBUFFALO BOSS NORTHFLY NAILS — $20,000 · OtherNEXT GENERATION DAY CAMP — $20,000 · OtherJ & SONS TRANSPORT LLC — $20,000 · OtherDELICIOUS BITES — $20,000 · OtherOH SNAP BY SHELL PHOTOGRAPHY LLC — $19,940 · Other+34 more — $373,956 · Other+34 more
Other$594,794

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Legacy Redevelopment CorporationWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy Redevelopment Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to African American Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin Inc?

Find your warmest path to African American Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph