Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Colorado · Public charity

Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA

The Africa Network for Animal Welfare-USA ANAW-USA works with the Africa Network for Animal Welfare ANAW in Kenya and other partners in advancing the inseparable welfare of animals humans and the environment by mobilizing resources expanding interorganizational capacity and facilitating exchanges of knowledge and expertise between the…

$705k
Granted FY2021
1
Itemized grants FY2021
1
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2021
$16k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$16,265
Largest grant, FY2021
$16,265
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$309k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Coalition for Intl$16,2651n/a

Compare Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA with peer funders

About Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA

How much does Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA give?
Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA reported 1 itemized grants totaling $16,265, out of $705,273 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2021, its largest causes are Environment (100%).
Who are Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2021: Coalition for Intl ($16k).
Where is Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA based?
Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $227k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Africa Network for Animal Welfare- USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home