Skip to content

· Public charity

Advisors Charitable Gift Fund

To promote charitable giving.

$6.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
133
Grants FY2025still arriving
32
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$15MReligion$6.8MEducation$6.1MHealth$5.2MInternational$1.7MHuman Services$1.5MAnimals$1.2MArts & Culture$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 133 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 133 grants below total $5,786,152, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,528,526 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $742,374 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $279k
  • $10k–50k74 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.1M
$10,240
Median grant
32
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc$1,448,286
Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund$514,060
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund$445,517
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc$392,366
Bucks County Childrens Museum$255,000
Presbyterian Mo-Ranch Assembly$198,971
Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund$153,270
US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants Inc$125,000
Geronimo Animal Rescue Team$120,000
Scholarship America$116,240
Brooklyn Friends School$100,000
John Maxwell Leadership Foundation Inc$100,000
Colorado Animal Rescue Express (CARE)$60,000
Central Fund of Israel$50,000
Christian Chapel Assembly of God$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Catholic CharitiesDiocese of Winona: $20k → 14%Forget Me Not Childrens Services: $12k → 9%Union Rescue Mission: $12k → 14%Guiding Eyes for the Blind Inc: $241k → 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $6k → 14%Rochester Area Neighborhood House Inc: $10k → 8%The Salvation Army: $307k → 12%North Carolina Lions Incorporated: $6k → 12%The Happy Factory: $10k → 13%Developmental Services Center Of Champaign County Inc: $10k → 19%New England Kurn Hattin Homes: $241k → 11%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $12k → 7%Catholic Charities of The Diocese Of Winona-Rochester: $20k → 14%Keys Childrens Foundation: $20k → 13%Westerville Area Resource Ministry: $7k → 15%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $10k → 7%Catholic Charities Of The Diocese Of Winona-Rochester: $10k → 14%Larkin Street Youth Services: $8k → 10%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $10k → 7%Catholic Charities Of The Diocese Of Winona-Rochester: $10k → 14%Larkin Street Youth Services: $8k → 10%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $10k → 7%Larkin Street Youth Services: $8k → 10%End Rape On Campus: $12k → 14%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $8k → 7%Larkin Street Youth Services: $8k → 10%Lakes Life Care Center for Women: $7k → 7%Baxter Community Center: $25k → 11%Tabor Children Service Inc: $15k → 22%Girls Who Code Inc: $50k → 17%Sacred Heart of Jesus DBA Redemptorist Society of Washington: $10k → 14%Baxter Community Center: $10k → 11%Tabor Children Service Inc: $15k → 22%Tabor Children Service Inc: $10k → 22%American Red Cross: $12k → 14%Plateau Outreach Ministries: $10k → 9%Tabor Children Service Inc: $10k → 22%Plateau Outreach Ministries: $9k → 9%Tabor Children Service Inc: $10k → 22%American Red Cross: $12k → 14%World Food Program USA: $10k → 14%West Ridge Academy: $13k → 8%American Red Cross: $7k → 14%One Body One Hope: $21k → 8%One Body One Hope: $13k → 8%One Body One Hope: $10k → 8%One Body One Hope: $10k → 8%The Innocence Project: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 304 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

304 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2025, 239 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

304
255

Total granted

$24M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+21%

Still filing today

64%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +39%
  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $715k · revenue +82%
  • Portland Youth Philharmonic Association
    6× · 2018–2025 · $402k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • FI
    FHF INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $307k · revenue +79% · 41% of their budget
  • MH
    MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $241k · revenue +52%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $241k · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
9
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Friendship Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Bay Animal Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

433 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 433 of the 650 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
89
Early backer (in before they grew)
421/433
Grantees still filing
305/433
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $9,670,935 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation IncMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,839,581 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUS…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $1,431,177 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INCRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND: $801,324 · PhilanthropyRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND+9 more: $1,276,779 · Philanthropy+9 moreLUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,055,000 · OtherLUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL+115 more: $11,691,514 · Other+115 moreSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $1,920,301 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $305,650 · EducationTHE BOARD O…+25 more: $1,998,146 · Education+25 moreDOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,564,500 · HealthDOYLESTOWN …Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $715,000 · HealthMinnesota T…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $339,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $234,000 · HealthPANCREATIC …THE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $200,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $147,284 · HealthCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 · Health+12 more: $801,296 · Health+12 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,059,144 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF SHEBOYGAN JAYCEES INC: $125,050 · Community ImprovementLA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC: $100,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $57,000 · Community ImprovementFHF INC: $307,256 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $240,506 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND KURN HATTIN HOMES: $240,506 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $66,300 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $60,000 · Human ServicesTabor Children's Services Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesLAKES LIFE CARE CENTER INC: $57,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $53,900 · Human ServicesONE BODY ONE HOPE: $53,777 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMaxwell Leadership Foundation Inc: $217,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $208,315 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $170,000 · InternationalHEALING HAITI: $140,000 · InternationalCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $75,000 · InternationalWALK IN THE LIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $67,500 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $57,700 · InternationalTURIMIQUIRE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $45,950 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $45,000 · International
Philanthropy$15,019,796Other$12,746,514Education$4,224,097Health$4,146,580Community Improvement$2,341,194Human Services$1,239,245International$1,076,965

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $9,670,935 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,059,144 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $1,920,301 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,839,581 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,564,500 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $1,431,177 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND: $801,324 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $715,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPortland Youth Philharmonic Association: $401,500 over 6y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $339,730 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $339,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFHF INC: $307,256 over 1y, 41% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $305,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $278,891 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $269,178 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $260,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $255,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $242,500 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $240,628 over 1y, 14% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $240,506 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW ENGLAND KURN HATTIN HOMES: $240,506 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $234,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMaxwell Leadership Foundation Inc: $217,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $208,315 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $205,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Animal Rescue Express (CARE): $196,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetEXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $187,398 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE NATIONAL ARTS CLUB: $185,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $170,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $147,284 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHEALING HAITI: $140,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $136,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK POPS INC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $130,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHEBOYGAN JAYCEES INC: $125,050 over 1y, 38% of budgetJosephine Community Library Foundation: $125,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Clackamas Education Foundation: $114,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetDESERT CAT RESCUE & SANCTUARY OF ARIZONA - DCRSA: $110,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetMACKINTOSH ACADEMY: $110,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCulinary Hospitality Outreach and Wellness: $107,100 over 2y, 51% of budgetEQUIP Leadership Inc: $105,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUS Grant High School of Portland OR Alumni Association: $100,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds DOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds Portland Youth Philharmonic Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FHF INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND KURN HATTIN HOMES ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Maxwell Leadership Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Animal Rescue Express (CARE) ↗
  • Who funds EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL ARTS CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationIL24.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Frey Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · The Wege Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Sebastian Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Steelcase Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Advisors Charitable Gift Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Advisors Charitable Gift Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • New England Kurn Hattin Homes: 1% of income from government
  • Portland Youth Philharmonic Association: 0% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
  • Linn-Benton Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Advisors Charitable Gift Fund?

Find your warmest path to Advisors Charitable Gift Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 650 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Advisors Charitable Gift’s filings →

More from the funding graph