Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$159kHuman Services$33kRecreation & Sports$29kEducation$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOYAL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$3,000
CLARK COUNTY OFFICE ON AGING$3,000
NEILLSVILLE FIRE AND RESCUE$2,600
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOYAL$2,500
CAMP VICTORY INC$2,300
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$2,000
PITTSVILLE FOOD PANTRY (PANS)$1,500
COMMUNITY UNITED FOOD PANTRY$1,500
THORP FOOD PANTRY$1,500
STANLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY$1,500
TAYLOR COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$1,500
FEED MY PEOPLE - OW$1,500
SPENCER FOOD PANTRY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND: $1k → 10%COOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 40 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
54

Total granted

$212k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+435%

Still filing today

15%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +79%
  • SA
    STANLEY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +271%
  • CF
    COOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +435%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison County Historical Society
Arts & Culture
2
St Clair County Humane Society

Maintain and care for incoming animals.

Animals
3
Union County Historical Society

Preservation of union county iowa hisorical information and artifacts.

—
4
Alfred & Lois Kelch Aviation Museum
Arts & Culture
5
Swift County Historical Society
—
6
Cedar County Historical Society

Preservation of cedar county iowa historical sites, education of public about cedar county iowa history, and provide to the public historical essays and publications about cedar county iowa.

—
7
Turtle Lake Community Hospital Association

The Turtle Lake Hospital Association is responsible for building improvement and maintenance of the community hospital.

—
8
Markesan Historical Society
—
9
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Association
Arts & Culture
10
Elcho Historical Society

A community-based organization with a collaborative and dedicated mission in collecting, preserving and sharing the history of Elcho, Wisconsin and the surrounding communities. The museum will house historical artifacts. There are plans…

Arts & Culture
11
Beautiful Hearts Rescue and Horse Sanctuary Ltd

Supporting the Human/Animal bond through animal rescue and rehabilitation, Supporting keeping animals in homes through programs in partnership with ADRC and other community outreach

Animals
12
Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin

Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin is a nonprofit educational organization whose primary purpose is to inspire and educate youth through hands-on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs focused on aviation. The…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stanley Area Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLARK COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $11,650 · OtherTHORP FOOD PANTRY: $10,650 · OtherSPENCER FOOD PANTRY: $10,650 · OtherGREENWOOD FOOD PANTRY: $10,650 · Other+89 more: $254,650 · Other+89 moreLOYAL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,650 · Food & NutritionSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthSTANLEY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHUEYS HIDEAWAY CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCLARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsCamp Victory Inc: $2,300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$298,250Food & Nutrition$10,650Housing & Shelter$5,500Health$5,000Arts & Culture$4,500Animals$3,000Recreation & Sports$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYAL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,650 over 6y, 24% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTANLEY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCamp Victory Inc: $2,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUEYS HIDEAWAY CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TAYLOR COUNTY: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOYAL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STANLEY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adler-Clark Electric Community Commitment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph