Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$136kArts & Culture$102kCivil Rights$31kHuman Services$20kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$19kPhilanthropy$16kEnvironment$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$981k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURGUNDY FARMS COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$26,500
THE RIVER HOUSE$7,000
CCAP$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY NAACP SCHOLARSHIPS$5,000
WPS TEACH FOR TOMORROW$5,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOODBANK$2,000
THE LAUREL CENTER$2,000
WORKFORCE HOUSING COALITION OF THE GREATER SEACOAST$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS WINCHESTER AREA$1,500
LIBERTY MEMS FOUNDATION$1,500
WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER$1,000
THE KIDS CLUBS OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC$1,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE LAUREL CENTER: $3k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $2k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $2k → 16%RAPP AT HOME: $500 → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $500 → 10%THE LAUREL CENTER: $1k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $1k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $1k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $1k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$309k · 29 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
25

Total granted

$309k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-11%

Still filing today

55%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIVER HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +205%
  • BF
    BURGUNDY FARM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +38%
  • TL
    THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -33%
  • WP
    WINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • WA
    Winchester Area Temporary Thermal Shelt
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rappahannock Elder Housing Corporation

Rappahannock elder housing corporation owns and operates leaflin lane apartments. these subsidized one-bedroom units in culpeper, va are available for rent to persons age 62 and older who meet the low income criteria established by hud.

Housing & Shelter
2
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
3
Virginia Affordable Housing Loan Fund

Housing loans to lower income persons

Community Improvement
4
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
5
Habitat for Humanity Middlesex Inc

Build affordable housing for low wage earner families of middlesex county, virginia.

Housing & Shelter
6
Winchester Little Theatre Inc

The acting, directing, and writing of staged plays to bring high quality entertainment and culture to our community through a variety of endeavors in the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Virginias House a Family Resource Center
Human Services
8
Habitat for Humanity Virginia

Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development

Housing & Shelter
9
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
10
Artisans Center of Virginia Inc

The artisans center of virginia develops and implements systems and strategies to improve economic outcomes for virginia artisans and their communities while assisting them in promoting their local artisan culture

—
11
Riverviews

Creating spaces where contemporary art inspires connection, sparks creativity, and fosters innovation.

Arts & Culture
12
Rappahannock Art League

Promotion and encouragement of art in virginia's northern neck and surrounding area. assisting local artists through workshops and displays.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Workforce Housing Coalition of the Greater Seacoas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY NAACP SCHOLARSHIPS: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY NAACP …WINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOL: $23,500 · OtherWINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLWINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 · OtherWINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLSUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST OF THE BLUE RIDGE: $12,500 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST OF THE BLUE RIDGEWINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACH FOR TOMORROW: $11,500 · OtherWINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACH FOR TOMORROWCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY: $11,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEYCCAP: $10,500 · OtherCCAPWinchester Area Temporary Thermal Shelt: $10,000 · OtherTHE KIDS CLUBS OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $9,000 · OtherWPS TEACH FOR TOMORROW: $8,500 · Other+29 more: $55,760 · Other+29 moreTHE RIVER HOUSE INC: $67,330 · Arts & CultureTHE RIVER HOUSE INCTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEU…ARTE LIBRE VA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILLS FORUM: $3,300 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBURGUNDY FARM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $42,500 · EducationBURGUNDY FARM COUNTR…LITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC: $18,000 · EducationLITERACY VOLUNTEERS …WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationWINCHESTER EDUCATION…THE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $4,350 · EducationTHE CHILD CARE AND L…+1 more: $1,750 · EducationWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterWORKFORCE HOUSING COALITION OF THE GREATER SEACOAS: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $11,830 · Human ServicesRAPP AT HOME: $1,000 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,250 · Crime & LegalBLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Crime & LegalLiberty Memes Foundation: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$192,760Arts & Culture$96,630Education$71,600Housing & Shelter$13,000Human Services$12,830Crime & Legal$7,750Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RIVER HOUSE INC: $67,330 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetBURGUNDY FARM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $42,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC: $18,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $11,830 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $9,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARTE LIBRE VA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $4,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORKFORCE HOUSING COALITION OF THE GREATER SEACOAS: $4,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetFOOTHILLS FORUM: $3,300 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLiberty Memes Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBELLE MEADE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES CENTER: $2,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAPPU INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCELEBRATING PATSY CLINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTOTALITY MARTIAL ARTS: $250 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RIVER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BURGUNDY FARM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTE LIBRE VA INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORKFORCE HOUSING COALITION OF THE GREATER SEACOAS ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds Liberty Memes Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BELLE MEADE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPPU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of Clarke County FoundationVA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Valley Health System · Fhi Services · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Adams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph