How much did ADAM AND MARIA SARAH SEYBERT grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of ADAM AND MARIA SARAH SEYBERT’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

sparkyouth

2019

sparkyouth

2020

sparkyouth

2021

youth

2022

youth

2023

philly

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k27 grants · $335k
$50k–250k2 grants · $110k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

INNER STRENGTH EDUCATION$60,000
ROCK TO THE FUTURE$50,000
GEMMA SERVICES$45,000
MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$40,000
ACHIEVE NOW$10,000
BIG PICTURE ALLIANCE$10,000
PHILADELPHIA ROBOTICS COALITION$10,000
NEW LEASH ON LIFE - USA$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILA$10,000
CENTRO NUEVA CREACION$10,000
BEYOND THE BARS$10,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$10,000
STARFINDER FOUNDATION$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS$10,000
MONKEY & THE ELEPHANT$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.5M · 69 repeat orgs$769k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.

69 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.5M

$624k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%

+64%

Still filing today

65%

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CB
CODED BY KIDS
4× · 2018–2021 · $90k · revenue +765%
CN
CENTRO NUEVA CREACION
8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +53%
RT
ROCK TO THE FUTURE
4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +185%

Funded once

TL
THE LIGHTHOUSE
one grant, 2022 · $60k
LA
LIGUORI ACADEMYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $58k · revenue +304%
GO
GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIAgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +143%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Emprendedores Inc

Education, arts and culture.

Arts & Culture

Philadelphia Performing Arts

To educate each child according to age and development, so that learning and growth are united; to integrate the developing mind and body of the child with academics and the performing arts to ensure each child's excellence in core and…

Education

Horizons Greater Philadelphia Inc

Horizons Greater Philadelphia advances educational equity by building long-term partnerships with students, families, communities, and schools to create experiences outside of school that inspire the joy of learning.

—

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.

Employment

Fab Youth Philadelphia

Fab youth philly (fyp) is a philadelphia-based youth development organization that provides innovative, award-winning programming for youth, with a programmatic focus on workforce development opportunities for teens ages 15-19.

Youth Development

Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education

Play on Philly

Play on philly provides intensive music instruction every day before and after school and over 25 performance opportunities throughout the year.

Arts & Culture

Friends of the Children - Philadelphia

Friends of the children commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their succes. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…

Education

Leadership Philadelphia

To mobilize and connect philadelphians to serve the community through classes, workshops and non-profit board placement.

Public Benefit

Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment

The Philadelphia Public School Notebook

By providing reporting and analysis about public schools in philadelphia and creating forums for dialogue and education, the philadelphia public school notebook empowers parents, educators, students and residents to improve conditions for…

—

Philly Kidz Initiative Llc

After school activities for children

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Youth Basketball Inc and the most unlike its peers is Starfinder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/83

the rest of the field

14%

1,343/9,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

76/82

Grantees still filing

59/82

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,773,000Education$589,172Arts & Culture$301,500Human Services$240,000Youth Development$178,500Community Improvement$100,010Recreation & Sports$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA101.6× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The William Penn Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Connelly Foundation · Grace S and W Linton Nelson · The Allen Hilles Fund · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · Union Benevolent Association · The Barra Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ADAM AND MARIA SARAH SEYBERT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AUTISM REC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 851361800 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AUTISM REC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert?

Find your warmest path to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ADAM AND MARIA SARAH SEYBERT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert?

More from the funding graph

ADAM AND MARIA SARAH SEYBERT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert?

More from the funding graph