· Private foundation
Actc Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUNY OSWEGO | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $50,000 |
| TUTTI BAMBINI FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO | $25,000 |
| THE VALLEY OF HOPE | $20,000 |
| EAST SYRACUSE MARCHING BAND BOOSTERS | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| UPSTATE FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| ELMCREST CHILDRENS CENTER | $5,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH CARONDELET | $5,000 |
| CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EFEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO5× · 2019–2023 · $199k · revenue +31%
- LTLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING3× · 2018–2020 · $65k · revenue +45%
- ECELMCREST CHILDREN'S CENTER INC5× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- OUOSWEGO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +88%
- OCONONDAGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -22%
- ACARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To conduct, support, assist and contribute to education, training and research in public policy issues.
Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…
The colorado mountain college foundation builds sustainable community support for the needs and strategic priorities of colorado mountain college and its students.
Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity and social justice, lfsrm strenghtens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the rocky mountain region.
We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…
The foundation's mission is to generate private financial support to further the mission of central piedmont community college.
To educate and inspire the next generation of problem solvers.
Partnering for safe and healthy communities.
As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epilepsy Foundation of Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Arapahoe County Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds OSWEGO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONONDAGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE ↗
- Who funds LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING ↗
- Who funds ELMCREST CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESSCNY INC ↗
- Who funds GFWC PROGRESS CLUB OF LAS CRUCES ↗
- Who funds ARAPAHOE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT ESCAPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE SOUTH PLATTE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
- Who funds CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Remerg ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Actc Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Actc Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Actc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.