Skip to content

· Public charity

Accelerate Change Inc

To develop and test new models for citizen organizing, particularly in communities of color, that are scalable, financially self-sustaining, and build deep, trusted relationships that can move people to take action.

$4.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Civil Rights$8.9MArts & Culture$3.9MHuman Services$3.3MPublic Benefit$940kScience & Tech$800kPhilanthropy$70k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $380k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.3M
$330,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUSHBLACK$3,450,000
GEN-Z FOR CHANGE INITIATIVE INC$481,601
NOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC$330,000
PROJECT PULSO INC$230,000
HER CAMPUS MEDIA LLC$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TIDES CENTER: $70k → 10%PARENTS TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $2.3M → 14%PARENTS TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $600k → 14%PARENTS TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%PARENTSTOGETHER: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Accelerate Change Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Accelerate Change Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 3 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +193% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$15M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+193%
+54%

Still filing today

67%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $862k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PUSHBLACK
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8.0M · revenue -60% · 52% of their budget
  • NM
    NOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3.9M
  • PF
    ParentsTogether Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +193% · 73% of their budget

Funded once

  • PP
    PROJECT PULSO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $800k
  • HC
    HEAD COUNT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue 0%
  • RT
    ROCK THE VOTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +751%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Voteorg

Vote.org's primary purpose is to build web-based technologies that remove barriers to voting and increase vote turnout.

Civil Rights
2
Issue One

Issue one is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization that educates the public, engages capitol hill, and advocates for solutions to fix our broken political system.

Public Benefit
3
MoveOnorg Civic Action

MoveOn.org Civic Action is a people-powered force for progress. MoveOn wields independent grassroots power by bringing millions together to take action to create a country with a place of honor and dignity for everyone. For more than a…

Education
4
RepresentUs

RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people. We unite people from all backgrounds to defend democracy, root out corruption, mobilize action, and support campaigns…

Public Benefit
5
Color of Changeorg Education Fund

Color of change.org education fund exists to empower our members - black americans and our allies to make decision makers more responsive to the concerns of black americans and to bring about positive social change for everyone.

Civil Rights
6
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
7
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
8
Nextgen Climate Action

Nextgen america empowers young people to engage in the democratic process through voter registration and civic engagement on issues of public policy. this is achieved through innovative digital outreach, communications, and grassroots…

Unclassified
9
Poder

PODER Inc. is a non-partisan organization that combats voter suppression by engaging Black and Brown New Yorkers around local, state, and federal elections.

Civil Rights
10
Tennessee Progress

Tennessee progress works to uplift the values and voices of the progressive movement across tennessee by elevating the issues that matter most to our communities. tennessee progress is a digital and communications hub for the progressive…

—
11
Action Tn

Action tn is dedicated to helping grassroots groups across tennessee expand and coordinate their civic and political engagement efforts in service of building power around our shared values, with a particular focus on empowering…

—
12
Move to Amend

Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock the Vote; the most unlike its peers is Casa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUSHBLACK: $8,015,715 · Civil RightsPUSHBLACKHEAD COUNT INC: $400,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $390,000 · Civil RightsNOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLC: $3,880,000 · OtherNOWTHIS MEDIA GROUP LLCPROJECT PULSO INC: $800,000 · OtherPROJECT PULSO INCGen-Z For Change Inc: $481,601 · OtherGen-Z For Change IncPROJECT PULSO ACTION INC: $230,000 · Other+3 more: $290,000 · OtherParentsTogether Foundation: $3,214,516 · Human ServicesParentsTogether Foun…+1 more: $70,000 · Human ServicesTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $70,000 · Public BenefitMake the Road New York: $70,000 · Crime & Legal
Civil Rights$8,805,715Other$5,681,601Human Services$3,284,516Public Benefit$70,000Crime & Legal$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUSHBLACK: $8,015,715 over 4y, 52% of budgetParentsTogether Foundation: $3,214,516 over 4y, 73% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC: $400,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $250,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $70,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMake the Road New York: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Accelerate Action IncMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Accelerate Action Inc · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Accelerate Change Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Accelerate Change Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Accelerate Change Inc?

Find your warmest path to Accelerate Change Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Accelerate Change’s filings →

More from the funding graph