Skip to content

· Public charity

Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Inc

To accelerate progress in what has been an underserved field of research; the organization aims to raise awareness about brain cancer and help mobilize critical scientific research through research grants.

$2.5M
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$3.2MScience & Tech$335k
02FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $597k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$97,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$1,861,035
UNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$169,292
BROAD INSTITUTE INC$156,726
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$116,523
TEMPUS INC$97,200
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$56,865
Individual grant recipient$20,000
UPLIFTING ATHLETES INC$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - MONTGOMERY$6,796
UNC LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $157k → 8%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%UPLIFTING ATHLETES INC: $10k → 6%SYAPSE INC: $100k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $117k → 14%EARLY SIGNAL FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $150k → 19%UNC LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 13%BENIZOLE THERAPEUTICS PBC: $20k → 7%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - MONTGOMERY: $73k → 8%BROAD INSTITUTE: $132k → 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $57k → 16%SYAPSE INC: $25k → 8%FLORIDA CENTER FOR BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH - UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH: $100k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - MONTGOMERY: $8k → 8%BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $101k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - MONTGOMERY: $7k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY: $1.9M → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$760k · 4 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$760k
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-23%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Broad Institute Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $390k · revenue +95%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $157k · revenue +162%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $88k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • CV
    COHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue -23%
  • ST
    SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
8
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
9
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unc Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $1,861,035 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDASYAPSE INC: $125,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $116,523 · OtherTEMPUS INC: $97,200 · Other+3 more: $54,363 · OtherThe Broad Institute Inc: $389,823 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $156,865 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Insti…COHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC: $125,000 · HealthCOHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENC…SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC: $100,000 · HealthSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $174,292 · EducationUNC HEALTH …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $99,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEE…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $88,070 · EducationJOHNS HOPKI…
Other$2,404,121Health$781,688Education$361,362

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $1,861,035 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $389,823 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $174,292 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $156,865 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $99,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $88,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFTING ATHLETES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEARLY SIGNAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,363 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Inc?

Find your warmest path to Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure’s filings →

More from the funding graph