Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abundant Grace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$68kInternational$49kHousing & Shelter$49kCrime & Legal$48kReligion$41kHuman Services$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOE EMPOWERS$18,000
BRIDGES TO LIFE$10,250
CYPRESS CREEK CHURCH$9,350
Individual grant recipient$6,304
Individual grant recipient$4,295
Individual grant recipient$2,995
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WIMBERLEY VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE$2,500
HILL COUNTRY ALLIANCE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,200
RIVERBEND CHURCH$2,000
WIMBERLEY COMMUNITY CIVIC CLUB$1,435
FRIENDS OF WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY$1,000
TESPA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $25 → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $14 → 10%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $500 → 16%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $250 → 16%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $250 → 16%BARNABAS CONNECTION: $3k → 10%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $250 → 16%BARNABAS CONNECTION: $1k → 10%BARNABAS CONNECTION: $500 → 10%BARNABAS CONNECTION: $500 → 10%BARNABAS CONNECTION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
NM
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 37 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
31

Total granted

$305k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+13%

Still filing today

51%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Zoe Empowers
    5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +42%
  • BT
    BRIDGES TO LIFE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $46k · revenue +2%
  • HC
    Hill Country Alliance
    4× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $17k
  • H
    HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
2
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
3
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
4
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
5
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Immigration Law Council

It is the mission of the Texas Immigration Law Council to protect and promote the basic rights of immigrants and refugees of all nationalities within Texas.

Civil Rights
7
Texans for Lawsuit Reform

See Schedule OTLR works to shape policy primarily in the Texas civil justice and court system through public education, legislative advocacy and building broad public support for a fair, competent and honest judiciary as well as a fair,…

Crime & Legal
8
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
9
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
10
Texas Legal Services Center Inc

Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

Crime & Legal
11
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
12
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CYPRESS CREEK CHURCH: $34,200 · OtherCYPRESS CREEK CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $22,808 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOME: $9,510 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,946 · Other+50 more: $56,339 · Other+50 moreWimberley Village Library Foundation: $50,000 · Public BenefitWimberley Villa…Zoe Empowers: $47,500 · InternationalZoe EmpowersCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,965 · InternationalBRIDGES TO LIFE: $45,955 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO LIFE+3 more: $2,850 · Crime & Legal+3 moreWIMBERLEY VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE: $4,300 · Arts & CultureEmilyAnn Theatre Inc: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $1,250 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $865 · Arts & CultureWimberley Players Inc: $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $200 · Arts & CultureHill Country Alliance: $6,500 · EnvironmentWILDFLOWER DONOR INC: $1,750 · EnvironmentTHE BARNABAS CONNECTION: $5,500 · Human ServicesRAISEUP FAMILIES: $1,250 · Human Services+1 more: $39 · Human Services
Other$190,203Public Benefit$50,000International$49,465Crime & Legal$48,805Arts & Culture$8,865Environment$8,250Human Services$6,789

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWimberley Village Library Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetZoe Empowers: $47,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $45,955 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHill Country Alliance: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARNABAS CONNECTION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWIMBERLEY VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE: $4,300 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CIVIC CLUB: $2,790 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCrisis Breadbasket: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGE Fellowship: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,965 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEmilyAnn Theatre Inc: $1,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRAISEUP FAMILIES: $1,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTART UP KIDS CLUB: $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC: $1,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJustice For All Immigrants: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $865 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Fair Defense Project: $850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternet Archive: $39 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wimberley Village Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Zoe Empowers ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Hill Country Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNABAS CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds WIMBERLEY VALLEY ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CIVIC CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Breadbasket ↗
  • Who funds EMERGE Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds WILDFLOWER DONOR INC ↗
  • Who funds EmilyAnn Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAISEUP FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds START UP KIDS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds Justice For All Immigrants ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON REVISION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX19.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Harry L Willett Foundation C O Boyd Ryan · The Burdine Johnson Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Angell Fund Inc · Herbert Kenneth and Janet Cleaves Acord Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · The Brown Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abundant Grace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abundant Grace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Abundant Grace Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Abundant Grace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abundant Grace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph