Skip to content
Abrahams Tent Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Abrahams Tent Inc

To build and support education in guyana and provide a safe and nurturing environment for children in need and help with educational grants to indigent young adults in north america

$184k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$383k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $23,675, the rows itemized in this filing. The $184,411 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $160,736 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$7,000
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY$6,675
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHWESTERN UNIV: $7k → 16%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%SUNY OLD WESTBURY: $8k → 6%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $9k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO: $15k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%NORTHEASTERNUNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%SUNY OLD WESTBURY: $8k → 6%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $9k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO: $10k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%SUNY OLD WESTBURY: $7k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%NASSAU COMMTY COLL: $9k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%NASSAU COMMTY COLL: $6k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AL
GA

Grants abroad, by region: $123k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$123k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARIT & EDUC.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$339k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+63%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $29k · revenue +18%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $27k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +63%
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Nassau Community College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $40,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $28,722 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $26,960 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYBucknell University: $18,705 · EducationBucknell UniversityNASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,294 · EducationNASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,970 · EducationBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $47,000 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $40,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,440 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $24,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON: $23,888 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTONSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT PURCHASE: $17,800 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT PURCHASENorthwestern University: $6,970 · Recreation & Sports
Education$191,651Other$184,128Recreation & Sports$6,970

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $28,722 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $26,960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $18,705 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,294 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $6,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds NASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrahams Tent Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrahams Tent Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Abrahams Tent Inc?

Find your warmest path to Abrahams Tent Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $123k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abrahams Tent’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home