Skip to content
Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800 at a glance

· Private foundation

Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$757kPhilanthropy$244kArts & Culture$200kAnimals$170kHealth$110kFood & Nutrition$95kEducation$86kInternational$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $224k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$51,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$40,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$34,000
FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KC MO$25,000
CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL$20,000
KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE$20,000
CORNERSTONES OF CARE$20,000
KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART$20,000
VILLAGE SHALOM$13,000
HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY$12,000
PAWSPERITY INC$10,000
NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM & MEMORIAL$10,000
HAPPY BOTTOMS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $519k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $25k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $20k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 5%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $20k → 15%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $15k → 15%EPEC INC: $10k → 15%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $15k → 15%SLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $10k → 15%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $15k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $10k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $10k → 15%SLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $5k → 15%HAPPY BOTTOMS: $5k → 15%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM: $13k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$1.4M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+0%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $268k · revenue +76%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $238k · revenue +98%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK
    5× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RABBIT HOLE KCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +208%
  • GK
    GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY ZOO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
2
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
3
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
4
Convention & Visitors Bureau of Greater Kansas City

To create global passion for kansas city. we do this through sales and marketing efforts to attract visitors and conventions to kansas city.

—
5
Kansas City Symphony

Its mission is to perform great performances for greater audiences. the kansas city symphony will achieve this mission by: - developing an uncompromising performance standard. - advancing the profile and value of the orchestra locally,…

Arts & Culture
6
Kansas City Ballet Association

To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance

Arts & Culture
7
Bionexus Kc

We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…

Science & Tech
8
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
9
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
10
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
11
Ewing Marion Kauffman School Inc

The mission of the kauffman school is to prepare students to excel academically, graduate from college and apply their unique talents in the world to create economically independent and personally fulfilling lives.

Education
12
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is After the Harvest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $268,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESCORNERSTONES OF CARE: $110,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES OF CAREVILLAGE SHALOM INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE SHALOM INCPAWSPERITY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesPAWSPERITY INC+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $238,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GRE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $237,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER K…KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $80,000 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CEN…NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL: $45,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WWI…PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $30,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC TELEV…THE RABBIT HOLE KC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RABBIT H…KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY …AFTER THE HARVEST: $90,000 · OtherAFTER THE…GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY: $25,000 · OtherGREATER K…KANSAS CITY ZOO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherKANSAS CI…JEWISH FEDERATION: $7,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $66,000 · EducationOPERATION…HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $66,000 · EducationHYMAN BRA…GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationGORDON PA…FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK: $145,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS O…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $105,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY: $5,000 · HealthGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $22,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$519,000Philanthropy$475,000Arts & Culture$200,000Other$152,000Education$152,000Animals$145,000Health$110,000Youth Development$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $268,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $238,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $237,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK: $145,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE SHALOM INC: $91,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER THE HARVEST: $90,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $66,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $66,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RABBIT HOLE KC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSLEEPYHEAD BEDS: $15,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Marion and Henry Bloc…Ewing Marion Kauffman…Oppenstein Brothers F…J B Reynolds Foundati…Arvin Gottlieb Charit…The Sherman Family Fo…The H & R Block Found…Jewish Community Foun…Enid and Crosby Kempe…G Kenneth and Ann Bau…The Francis Family Fo…
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO35.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · J B Reynolds Foundation · Arvin Gottlieb Charitable Foundation 10015600 · The Sherman Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Enid and Crosby Kemper Foundation 10018904 · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · The Francis Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800?

    Find your warmest path to Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home