Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abbarah Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$22kReligion$18kArts & Culture$7kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$3kHealth$400Civil Rights$300
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HORIZON SCHOOL$5,000
PIANOS FOR PEACE$1,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIANOS FOR PEACE: $2k → 13%PIANOS FOR PEACE: $2k → 13%PIANOS FOR PEACE: $1k → 13%PIANOS FOR PEACE: $1k → 13%WORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 21%PIANOS FOR PEACE: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +263% since the first grant, against +174% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$42k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+263%
+174%

Still filing today

43%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PIANOS FOR PEACE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +263%
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +336%
  • WF
    Women for Humanity
    2× · 2018–2020 · $850 · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WP
    WORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -2%
  • IH
    INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +174%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
2
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
3
Council for Democracy & Tolerance

SEE PART 1, LINE A MISSION AND PRINCIPLESAdvocating universal individual human rights without exceptions, Advocating literacy and education as the cornerstones to personal development and true humanity, Empowering and supporting…

—
4
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
5
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
6
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Coalition for Democracy and Human Rights in Iran
Civil Rights
8
Wellness for Humanity Foundation
—
9
World Health Foundation
—
10
Alsajdah Foundation
Religion
11
We Are All Human Foundation
Civil Rights
12
Association of Pakistani Women in America Inc

Help disabled women and children in pakistan

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Peace Association; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HORIZON SCHOOL: $9,904 · OtherNEW HORIZON SCHOOLMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYMUSLIM UNITY CENTER: $7,000 · OtherMUSLIM UNITY CENTERUNITY CENTER: $4,620 · OtherUNITY CENTERWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,400 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $2,100 · Other+4 morePIANOS FOR PEACE INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesPIANOS FOR PEACE …WORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION: $2,030 · Human ServicesWORLD PEACE ASSOC…ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · Arts & CultureISLAMIC CULT…INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEF: $2,000 · InternationalWomen for Humanity: $850 · InternationalPURE HANDS INC: $600 · InternationalAmerican Muslim Community Foundation: $2,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · Health
Other$35,024Human Services$8,530Arts & Culture$6,000International$3,450Philanthropy$2,000Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPIANOS FOR PEACE INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION: $2,030 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Muslim Community Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWomen for Humanity: $850 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PIANOS FOR PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American Muslim Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Women for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Symn FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Symn Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abbarah Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abbarah Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abbarah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph