Skip to content
Ab-Nadiv Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ab-Nadiv Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$110kCrime & Legal$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kInternational$40kEnvironment$25kReligion$15kEducation$14kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY HARVEST$30,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$15,000
HADASSAH$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Philabundance: $10k → 22%CITY HARVEST: $30k → 17%Arete Education Inc: $4k → 28%No Kid Hungry: $10k → 14%Equal Justice Initiative: $10k → 18%Save the Children: $10k → 9%Feeding America: $10k → 14%Meals on Wheels: $10k → 7%TREES FOR THE FUTURE: $10k → 8%CITY HARVEST: $30k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $30k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE: $30k → 9%HIAS: $15k → 8%City Harvest: $10k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $30k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE: $30k → 9%Coalition for the Homeless: $10k → 17%World Central Kitchen: $10k → 14%Sandy Hook Promise: $1k → 9%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $15k → 17%First Book: $10k → 14%HADASSAH: $15k → 17%OCEANA INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CT
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 3 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$201k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalEnvironmentCrime & LegalEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +3%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +21%
  • SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • OI
    OCEANA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -23%
  • TF
    TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
8
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
9
Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.

International
10
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $70,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $15,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMET…HIAS INC: $15,000 · InternationalHIAS INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncCITY HARVEST INC: $70,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INCFeeding America: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaPhilabundance: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $61,000 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE …HADASSAH: $15,000 · OtherHADASSAHSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $10,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRE…COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $10,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR …MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEEL…OCEANA INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentFIRST BOOK: $10,000 · EducationEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,000 · Civil RightsARETE EDUCATION INC: $4,000 · Youth Development
International$110,000Food & Nutrition$90,000Crime & Legal$61,000Other$45,000Environment$25,000Education$10,000Civil Rights$10,000Youth Development$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPhilabundance: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARETE EDUCATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ab-Nadiv Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ab-Nadiv Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ab-Nadiv Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ab-Nadiv Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ab-Nadiv’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home