Skip to content
A T Still University of Health Sciences at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$232kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $76,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,262,418 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,186,118 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $63k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$601M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc$13,000
Special Olympics Missouri Inc$10,000
Missouri Coalition for Primary Hlth$10,000
Christian Community Health Fellowship Inc$10,000
Teche Action Clinic$10,000
Mollen Foundation for Childhood Obesity$10,000
American Osteopathic Foundation Inc$7,800
California Primary Care Association$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $14k → 11%California Primary Care Association: $6k → 12%Special Olympics Missouri Inc: $10k → 10%ADAIR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25k → 28%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FELLOWSHIP: $10k → 17%American Osteopathic Foundation Inc: $8k → 14%Teche Action Clinic: $10k → 25%Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc: $13k → 11%MISSOURI ASSOC OF OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEO: $10k → 10%Christian Community Health Fellowship Inc: $10k → 17%American Osteopathic Foundation Inc: $8k → 14%TECHE ACTION CLINIC: $6k → 25%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $12k → 11%Wm L Wetzel Memorial Osteopathic Educational & Research Foundation: $6k → 10%Christian Community Health Fellowship Inc: $10k → 17%AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc: $10k → 11%MISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $10k → 10%AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $10k → 11%Missouri Coalition for Primary Hlth: $10k → 10%American Association of Nurses Practitioners Inc: $6k → 14%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $10k → 11%Mollen Foundation for Childhood Obesity: $10k → 11%AMERICAN STUDENT DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%AMERICAN STUDENT DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%AMERICAN STUDENT DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 6 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$166k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +85%
  • AO
    AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +40%
  • MC
    MISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
    2× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +420%

Funded once

  • AC
    ADAIR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AO
    Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue -12%
  • MA
    MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

American college of occupational and environmental medicine (acoem) provides leadership to promote optimal health and safety of workers, workplaces and environments by: educating health professionals and the public; stimulating research;…

Arts & Culture
2
Iowa Medical Society

Our mission is to advance the practice of medicine through advocacy, education, and engagement with physicians throughout iowa to ensure the highest quality of care for the patients they serve.

—
3
American Academy of Osteopathy

To teach, advocate, and research the science, art and philosophy of osteopathic medicine, emphasizing the integration of osteopathic principles, practices and manipulative treatment in patient care.

Health
4
American Osteopathic Association

The american osteopathic association (aoa) is a membership association representing more than 168,000 osteopathic physicians (do) and osteopathic medical students. as the primary certifying body for do and the accrediting agency for all…

Health
5
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…

Education
6
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
7
American Academy of Optometry

To maintain and enhance excellence in optometric practice.

Education
8
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Advancing, promoting and preserving the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as the skills and professionalism of aaoms members to ensure patient access to safe and effective care.

—
9
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Serving our professionals to provide the highest quality musculoskeletal care.

Health
10
American Board of Ophthalmology

None

—
11
American Association of Medical Society Executives

American association of medical society executives (aamse) is committed to educating and supporting medical society professionals to advance the profession of medical society management, medical societies, and the physicians they serve.

—
12
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Student Dental Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FELLOWSHIP INC: $30,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FELLOWSHIP INCAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $26,800 · OtherAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATIONADAIR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25,000 · OtherADAIR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTMISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: $20,000 · OtherMISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CAREArizona Osteopathic Medical Association: $13,900 · OtherArizona Osteopathic Medical AssociationSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $10,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INCMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS: $10,000 · OtherMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONSWM L WETZEL MEMORIAL OSTEOPATHIC EDUCATIONAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS: $5,500 · OtherARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $55,000 · HealthARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY H…TECHE ACTION BOARD INC: $15,597 · HealthTECHE ACTION BOARD INCCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $5,500 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATIO…AMERICAN STUDENT DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $18,750 · EducationAMERICAN STU…MOLLEN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD OBESITY: $10,000 · EducationMOLLEN FOUND…
Other$146,700Health$76,097Education$28,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FELLOWSHIP INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $26,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTECHE ACTION BOARD INC: $15,597 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Osteopathic Medical Association: $13,900 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWM L WETZEL MEMORIAL OSTEOPATHIC EDUCATIONAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A T Still University of Health Sciences funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A T Still University of Health Sciences. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A T Still University of Health Sciences’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home