Skip to content

· Private foundation

A J Schwartze Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$355k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$7.7MReligion$3.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$894kRecreation & Sports$628kSocial Science$451kCommunity Improvement$170kPublic Benefit$168kHuman Services$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $605k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $631k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL (EXPANSION PROJECT)$355,000
Individual grant recipient$276,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL$175,000
ST MARY SCHOOL (FRANKENSTEIN)$105,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$105,000
ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$105,000
HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL$105,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL$105,000
ST GEORGE SCHOOL$105,000
VITAE FOUNDATION$75,000
WESTPHALIA LIONS CLUB HOME ASSOCIATION$75,000
ST ALOYSIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$65,000
VISITATION INTER-PARISH SCHOOL$60,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$50,000
FARMER TRACTOR PULLER ASSOCIATION$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SAMARITAN CENTER: $10k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $8k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $7k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 81 repeat orgs$749k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships: 66 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
7

Total granted

$13M
$337k

Still filing today

16%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $411k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WESTPHALIA LIONS CLUB HOME ASSOC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $354k · revenue +135% · 51% of their budget
  • FC
    FREEBURG COMMUNITY FIRE ASSOCATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +67%
  • WS
    WESTPHALIA SENIOR CITIZENS COMPLEX INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $102k · revenue +37% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $259k
  • FK
    FREEBURG KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 9700
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH HELPING HANDS OF ST ELIZABETH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Moniteau County Nutrition Center

Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.

—
2
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
3
Four C Volunteer Fire Department

Emergency Response

—
4
Carlisle Lions Community Ambulance Inc

To provide ambulance service to a rural community

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Wheatland County Senior Citizens Center

Providing care and services for senior citizens.

—
6
McPherson County Rural Fire Department

Provide fire/emergency services and education - Governmental

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Bibb Co Save a Life Inc

Counseling services regarding life choic

Human Services
8
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
9
Eolia Community Fire Department Inc

Fire protection

—
10
Hope Ministries-St Charles County Inc

Overseen and supported by about nine churches in the St. Charles County Mo area. HOPE Food Pantry provides for the needy in and around our community. We distribute groceries weekly to anyone in need. We also help provide items such as baby…

Religion
11
Choose Life Wisconsin Inc

to support WI Pregnancy Resource Centers

Civil Rights
12
Stl Village Inc

Provide Social Services for those 50 up

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital City Area Council for Special Services; the most unlike its peers is Life Runners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,405,496 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY FAMILY SCHOOL: $831,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY SCHOOLIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL: $701,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $681,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $631,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $631,000 · OtherST GEORGE SCHOOL: $601,000 · OtherST MARY SCHOOL (FRANKENSTEIN): $600,920 · OtherVISITATION INTER-PARISH SCHOOL: $553,000 · OtherVITAE FOUNDATION: $451,325 · Other+76 more: $6,183,228 · Other+76 moreWESTPHALIA SENIOR CITIZENS COMPLEX INC: $102,000 · Housing & ShelterOSAGE COUNTY COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $32,475 · Housing & ShelterCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $49,500 · Human ServicesTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesMORRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $76,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $50,000 · EducationLIFE RUNNERS: $35,000 · Civil RightsHEALING HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGAM: $6,000 · Health
Other$13,269,969Housing & Shelter$134,475Human Services$84,500Public Safety & Disaster$76,000Education$50,000Civil Rights$35,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $451,325 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetWESTPHALIA LIONS CLUB HOME ASSOC: $354,000 over 6y, 51% of budgetFREEBURG COMMUNITY FIRE ASSOCATION INC: $155,345 over 6y, 19% of budgetWESTPHALIA SENIOR CITIZENS COMPLEX INC: $102,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetMORRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $76,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $49,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $43,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $35,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetLIFE RUNNERS: $35,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetOSAGE COUNTY COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $32,475 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMM-UNITY AMBULANCE: $12,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetHEALING HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGAM: $6,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJEFFERSON CITY AREA YMCA: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTPHALIA LIONS CLUB HOME ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds FREEBURG COMMUNITY FIRE ASSOCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTPHALIA SENIOR CITIZENS COMPLEX INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Schell Family FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Schell Family Foundation · United Way of Central Missouri Inc · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A J Schwartze Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A J Schwartze Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A J Schwartze Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to A J Schwartze Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A J Schwartze’s filings →

    More from the funding graph