Skip to content

· Private foundation

A J Frank Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$295k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.4MEducation$675kReligion$560kAnimals$120kHuman Services$72kHousing & Shelter$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kInternational$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIS ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$67,500
CANYON CRISIS CENTER$40,000
MT ANGEL ABBEY$40,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$15,000
FATHER TAAFFE HOMES$10,200
COMMON SENSE FOR OREGON FOUNDATION$10,000
SISTERS OF ST MARY$10,000
ST MARY'S CHURCH$8,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,100
SISTERS OF THE HOLY NAME$5,000
BENEDICTINE SISTERS$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WILLAMETTE VITAL HEALTH HOSPICE: $100 → 13%CANYON GLEANERS: $5k → 13%CANYON GLEANERS: $3k → 13%CANYON CLEANERS: $2k → 13%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $2k → 14%CANYON GLEANERS: $2k → 13%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $2k → 14%CANYON GLEANERS: $2k → 13%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $100 → 14%ABC HOUSE: $3k → 13%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IN
CA
MD
KS
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 49 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
25

Total granted

$2.8M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

31%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CANYON CRISIS AND RESOURCE CENTER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $214k · revenue +22%
  • OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +30%
  • CG
    Canyon Gleaners
    5× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • SC
    Santiam Canyon School District
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SC
    SANTIAM CANYON WILDFIRE RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TA
    THE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
2
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
5
Providence Portland Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
6
Southern Oregon Land Conservancy Inc

To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.

Environment
7
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
8
Asante Foundation

The asante foundation's primary exempt purpose is to raise monies and in-kind donations to further the exempt purpose of asante, a 501(c)(3) hospital and healthcare system which services the healthcare needs of the citizens of southern…

Health
9
Agricultural Research Foundation

Our mission is to encourage facilitate support and engage in scientific investigation and research experimentation and to advance educational and training activities related to agriculture and natural resources throughout the state of…

—
10
Health Share of Oregon

The charitable purposes of the organization include, but are not limited to, developing an integrated community health system that achieves better care, better health, and lower costs for the medicaid population and the tri-county…

Health
11
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
12
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canyon Gleaners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTIAM HOSPITAL: $1,100,000 · OtherSANTIAM HOSPITALREGIS ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $534,250 · OtherREGIS ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOLMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY: $200,000 · OtherMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY+61 more: $876,559 · Other+61 moreCANYON CRISIS AND RESOURCE CENTER: $213,750 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,100 · Health+3 more: $500 · HealthOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsOREGON DOG RESCUE: $10,000 · AnimalsNCASI FOUNDATION: $9,000 · AnimalsCanyon Gleaners: $14,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $5,100 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationLOURDES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $4,725 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $12,000 · InternationalCOMMON SENSE FOR OREGON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,710,809Health$224,350Animals$34,000Human Services$32,300Education$17,225International$12,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANYON CRISIS AND RESOURCE CENTER: $213,750 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCanyon Gleaners: $14,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFORESTS FOREVER INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON DOG RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE FOR OREGON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSTAYTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $9,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNCASI FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND SENSE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $5,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOURDES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $4,725 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetABC HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON WOMEN IN TIMBER: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANYON CRISIS AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Canyon Gleaners ↗
  • Who funds FORESTS FOREVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE FOR OREGON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR31.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Freres Foundation · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation · The Salem Foundation · Ralph Hull Foundation · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Maps Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Brenden Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A J Frank Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A J Frank Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Canyon Crisis and Resource Center: 81% of income from government
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Oregon Women in Timber: 28% of income from government
  • Abc House Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Forests Forever Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
  • Santiam Memorial Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Willamette Vital Health: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A J Frank Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph